Opin vísindi

Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland

Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland


Title: Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland
Author: Wolfe, Cecily J.
Bjarnason, Ingi Þorleifur   orcid.org/0000-0001-5716-7053
VanDecar, John C.
Solomon, Sean C.
Date: 2002
Language: English
Scope: 1-4
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
School: Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)
Department: Raunvísindastofnun (HÍ)
Science Institute (UI)
Series: Geophysical Research Letters;29(2)
ISSN: 0094-8276
1944-8007 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1029/2001GL013657
Subject: Convection currents; Mantle plume; Lithosphere; Tornography; Jarðmöttull; Jarðskorpa; Möttulstrókur; Aflfræði
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/569

Show full item record

Citation:

Wolfe, C. J., Bjarnason, I. T., VanDecar, J. C., & Solomon, S. C. (2002). Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(2), 1-4. doi:10.1029/2001GL013657

Abstract:

Earlier inversions of body wave delay-time data recorded during the ICEMELT portable broadband experiment imaged a cylindrical plume-like low-velocity anomaly extending to at least 400 km depth beneath Iceland, but the depth extent of the anomaly resolvable by tomography has recently been called into question. We have performed several additional resolution tests to evaluate the depth resolution of tomographic models of the Icelandic upper mantle. The distribution of paths of body waves recorded by ICEMELT can distinguish among three different types of models: (a) a wide and shallow anomaly, (b) a narrow and deep anomaly, and (c) a narrow and shallow anomaly. While tomographic models contain an element of nonuniqueness, these tests illustrate that the depth resolution of passive seismic experiments spanning subaerial Iceland is adequate for distinguishing among alternative geodynamic models.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)