Opin vísindi

An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Cook, David
dc.contributor.author Sigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir
dc.contributor.author Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur
dc.contributor.author Bogason, Sigurður G.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-04-25T11:10:59Z
dc.date.available 2022-04-25T11:10:59Z
dc.date.issued 2022-07
dc.identifier.citation David Cook, Hafþór Ægir Sigurjónsson, Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, Sigurður G. Bogason, An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France, Geothermics, Volume 103, 2022, 102425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425.
dc.identifier.issn 0375-6505
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3078
dc.description Pre-print / Óritrýnt handrit © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract Environmental life cycle costing (ELCC) is a tool which aggregates five categories of monetary costs across a project's life cycle: investment, operation, maintenance, end-of-life, and externalities. This paper summarises the results from the first two ELCC studies involving deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). The ReCiPe method was used to transform life cycle impact factors into economic costs for externalities. The two case studies are the pilot EGS project in Reykjanes, Iceland and the Vendenheim co-generation plant in France. The ELCC of the Reykjanes project is estimated in the range 14.47–15.78 million euros, with investment and well drilling projected to constitute 83% of these amounts. An ELCC in the range 91.90–113.97 million euros is estimated for Vendenheim, with the production plant, well drilling, and operations and maintenance costs accounting for the majority. The levelized costs of energy associated with Vendenheim (mean Є45.0/MWh/year) and Reykjanes (mean Є16.5/MWh/year) are at the lower end of the range normally reported for geothermal power projects. Although the case studies cannot be directly compared since Reykjanes involves the drilling of a single well and Vendenheim a co-generation plant and two wells, the outcomes suggest that deep EGS projects may involve cost-savings compared to conventional geothermal power ventures.
dc.format.extent 102425
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/690771
dc.relation.ispartofseries Geothermics;103
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Geology
dc.subject Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
dc.subject Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
dc.subject Endurnýjanleg orka
dc.subject Jarðhiti
dc.subject Sjálfbærni
dc.subject Umhverfisáhrif
dc.subject Kostnaðargreining
dc.title An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.identifier.journal Geothermics
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425
dc.contributor.department Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)
dc.contributor.school Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu