Opin vísindi

An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France

An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France


Titill: An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France
Höfundur: Cook, David   orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-0515
Sigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir
Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur
Bogason, Sigurður G.
Útgáfa: 2022-07
Tungumál: Enska
Umfang: 102425
Háskóli/Stofnun: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
Svið: Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)
Deild: Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)
Birtist í: Geothermics;103
ISSN: 0375-6505
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425
Efnisorð: Geology; Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Endurnýjanleg orka; Jarðhiti; Sjálfbærni; Umhverfisáhrif; Kostnaðargreining
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3078

Skoða fulla færslu

Tilvitnun:

David Cook, Hafþór Ægir Sigurjónsson, Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, Sigurður G. Bogason, An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France, Geothermics, Volume 103, 2022, 102425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425.

Útdráttur:

Environmental life cycle costing (ELCC) is a tool which aggregates five categories of monetary costs across a project's life cycle: investment, operation, maintenance, end-of-life, and externalities. This paper summarises the results from the first two ELCC studies involving deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). The ReCiPe method was used to transform life cycle impact factors into economic costs for externalities. The two case studies are the pilot EGS project in Reykjanes, Iceland and the Vendenheim co-generation plant in France. The ELCC of the Reykjanes project is estimated in the range 14.47–15.78 million euros, with investment and well drilling projected to constitute 83% of these amounts. An ELCC in the range 91.90–113.97 million euros is estimated for Vendenheim, with the production plant, well drilling, and operations and maintenance costs accounting for the majority. The levelized costs of energy associated with Vendenheim (mean Є45.0/MWh/year) and Reykjanes (mean Є16.5/MWh/year) are at the lower end of the range normally reported for geothermal power projects. Although the case studies cannot be directly compared since Reykjanes involves the drilling of a single well and Vendenheim a co-generation plant and two wells, the outcomes suggest that deep EGS projects may involve cost-savings compared to conventional geothermal power ventures.

Athugasemdir:

Pre-print / Óritrýnt handrit © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum: