An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorCook, David
dc.contributor.authorSigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir
dc.contributor.authorDavíðsdóttir, Brynhildur
dc.contributor.authorBogason, Sigurður G.
dc.contributor.departmentLíf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T11:10:59Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T11:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-07
dc.descriptionPre-print / Óritrýnt handrit © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental life cycle costing (ELCC) is a tool which aggregates five categories of monetary costs across a project's life cycle: investment, operation, maintenance, end-of-life, and externalities. This paper summarises the results from the first two ELCC studies involving deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). The ReCiPe method was used to transform life cycle impact factors into economic costs for externalities. The two case studies are the pilot EGS project in Reykjanes, Iceland and the Vendenheim co-generation plant in France. The ELCC of the Reykjanes project is estimated in the range 14.47–15.78 million euros, with investment and well drilling projected to constitute 83% of these amounts. An ELCC in the range 91.90–113.97 million euros is estimated for Vendenheim, with the production plant, well drilling, and operations and maintenance costs accounting for the majority. The levelized costs of energy associated with Vendenheim (mean Є45.0/MWh/year) and Reykjanes (mean Є16.5/MWh/year) are at the lower end of the range normally reported for geothermal power projects. Although the case studies cannot be directly compared since Reykjanes involves the drilling of a single well and Vendenheim a co-generation plant and two wells, the outcomes suggest that deep EGS projects may involve cost-savings compared to conventional geothermal power ventures.en_US
dc.format.extent102425en_US
dc.identifier.citationDavid Cook, Hafþór Ægir Sigurjónsson, Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, Sigurður G. Bogason, An environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France, Geothermics, Volume 103, 2022, 102425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102425
dc.identifier.issn0375-6505
dc.identifier.journalGeothermicsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3078
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/690771en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGeothermics;103
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeologyen_US
dc.subjectGeotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geologyen_US
dc.subjectRenewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environmenten_US
dc.subjectEndurnýjanleg orkaen_US
dc.subjectJarðhitien_US
dc.subjectSjálfbærnien_US
dc.subjectUmhverfisáhrifen_US
dc.subjectKostnaðargreiningen_US
dc.titleAn environmental life cycle cost assessment of the costs of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, Franceen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 2 af 2
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
Cook et al. 2022, pre-print.pdf
Stærð:
518.46 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Pre-print
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
Fylgiskjal_fyrir_post-print_og_pre-print (12).pdf
Stærð:
154.7 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Fylgiskjal vegna pre-print útgáfu greinar

Undirflokkur