Opin vísindi

Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter

Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter


Titill: Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter
Höfundur: Thorhallsson, Baldur   orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-8500
Joensen, Tómas
Útgáfa: 2015
Tungumál: Enska
Umfang: 187-206
Háskóli/Stofnun: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
Svið: Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Social Sciences (UI)
Deild: Stjórnmálafræðideild (HÍ)
Faculty of Political Science (UI)
Alþjóðamálastofnun (HÍ)
Institute of International Affairs and Centre for Small State Studies (UI)
Birtist í: Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla;11:2
ISSN: 1670-6803
1670-679X (e-ISSN)
DOI: 10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.4
Efnisorð: Smáríki; Þjóðaröryggi; Utanríkismál; Ísland; Danmörk; Bretland
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/78

Skoða fulla færslu

Tilvitnun:

Baldur Þórhallsson og Tómas Joensen. 2015. Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter. Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla. 11:2, 187-206

Útdráttur:

This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.

Leyfi:

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:


Fletta

Um vefinn

Reikningurinn minn