Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorThorhallsson, Baldur
dc.contributor.authorJoensen, Tómas
dc.contributor.departmentStjórnmálafræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Political Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentAlþjóðamálastofnun (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of International Affairs and Centre for Small State Studies (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolFélagsvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Social Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-02T15:05:19Z
dc.date.available2016-09-02T15:05:19Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.en_US
dc.description.versionRitrýnt tímarit
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden_US
dc.format.extent187-206en_US
dc.identifier.citationBaldur Þórhallsson og Tómas Joensen. 2015. Iceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelter. Stjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla. 11:2, 187-206en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.13177/irpa.a.2015.11.2.4
dc.identifier.issn1670-6803
dc.identifier.issn1670-679X (e-ISSN)
dc.identifier.journalStjórnmál og stjórnsýsla
dc.identifier.journalIcelandic Review of Politics & Administrationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/78
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherStofnun stjórnsýslufræða og stjórnmála við Háskóla Íslandsen_US
dc.relationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStjórnmál og Stjórnsýsla;11:2
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.irpa.isen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSmáríkien_US
dc.subjectÞjóðaröryggien_US
dc.subjectUtanríkismálen_US
dc.subjectÍslanden_US
dc.subjectDanmörken_US
dc.subjectBretlanden_US
dc.titleIceland’s external affairs from the Napoleonic era to the occupation of Denmark: Danish and British shelteren_US
dcterms.licenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
Iceland’s External Affairs....pdf
Stærð:
508.3 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Undirflokkur