Titill: | The Validity of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders Revised (SCARED-R) Scale and Sub-Scales in Swedish Youth |
Höfundur: |
|
Útgáfa: | 2017-07-29 |
Tungumál: | Enska |
Umfang: | 234-243 |
Háskóli/Stofnun: | Háskóli Íslands University of Iceland |
Svið: | Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ) School of Health Sciences (UI) |
Deild: | Sálfræðideild (HÍ) Faculty of Psychology (UI) |
Birtist í: | Child Psychiatry & Human Development;49(2) |
ISSN: | 0009-398X 1573-3327 (eISSN) |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10578-017-0746-8 |
Efnisorð: | Self-rating scale; Parent rating scale; Anxiety disorder; Concurrent validity; Discriminant validity; LEAD diagnosis; Kvíðaviðbrögð; Börn; Foreldrar; Sálfræðipróf; Greining frávika |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/680 |
Tilvitnun:Ivarsson, T., Skarphedinsson, G., Andersson, M., & Jarbin, H. (2018). The Validity of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders Revised (SCARED-R) Scale and Sub-Scales in Swedish Youth. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 49(2), 234-243. doi:10.1007/s10578-017-0746-8
|
|
Útdráttur:We evaluated the clinical utility of the Swedish SCARED-R in child- and adolescent psychiatric outpatients (n = 239) and validated it against Longitudinal Expert All Data (LEAD) DSM IV diagnoses based on the Children’s Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) and subsequent clinical work-up and treatment outcome. The SCARED-R total score and subscales had acceptable sensitivity/specificity for child and parent reports for cut-offs based on Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, with mostly moderate area under the curve. Sensitivity ranged from 75% (parent rated social anxiety) to 79% [child rated Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)]. Specificity, ranged from 60% for child-rated GAD to 88% for parent rated social anxiety. Parent-child agreement was moderate, and each informant provided unique information contributing to most diagnoses. In conclusion, the SCARED-R is useful for screening anxiety symptoms in clinical populations. However, it cannot replace interview based diagnoses, nor is it adequate to use just one informant.
|
|
Leyfi:This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
|