Opin vísindi

Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Smárason, Birgir Örn
dc.contributor.author Ögmundarson, Ólafur
dc.contributor.author Arnason, Jon
dc.contributor.author Bjornsdottir, Rannveig
dc.contributor.author Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-12T14:26:00Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-12T14:26:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Smárason, B.Ö., Ögmundarson, Ó., Árnason, J., Björnsdóttir, R., & Davíðsdóttir, B. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 17, 79-90. http://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_10
dc.identifier.issn 1303-2712
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/623
dc.description.abstract This study utilized Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of 1 kg of live-weight Arctic char, cultivated in an Icelandic land-based aquaculture farm. The functional unit included assessments of three different feed types; standard feed with high inclusion levels of marine ingredients (Conv.), experimental feed with high inclusion levels of agricultural ingredients (ECO) and a hypothetical Black soldier fly larvae based feed (BSF). Results of the study indicated that the feed production causes the greatest environmental impacts from all feed types considered. The Black soldier fly based feed demonstrated the best environmental performance of the three feed types. Furthermore, it can be concluded that by increasing agriculture based ingredients at the cost of marine based ingredients, a better environmental performance can be reached. This study demonstrated the importance of feed production for aquaculture in terms of environmental impacts and showed that byoptimizing feed consumption, reducing the amount of fishmeal and fish oil and even creating new types of feed from novel ingredients, the overall impacts of aquaculture can be greatly reduced.
dc.description.sponsorship The study was conducted as a part of MSc studies in Environmental and Natural Resources at the University of Iceland, in collaboration with Matis ltd., Icelandic food and biotech R&D, which also funded the project. The authors are grateful for the financial and expert support provided by both entities. The authors would also like to thank the owner of the aquaculture company involved in the study, for clear and concise data provision, and also other companies that provided data for this study.
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Central Fisheries Research Institute, Trabzon, Turkey
dc.relation.ispartofseries Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences;17(1)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Aquaculture
dc.subject Arctic charr
dc.subject Life cycle assessment
dc.subject Fishmeal replacement
dc.subject Insect feed
dc.subject Fiskeldi
dc.subject Bleikja
dc.subject Fiskafóður
dc.title Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
dc.identifier.doi 10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_10
dc.contributor.department Hagfræðideild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Economics (UI)
dc.contributor.department Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)
dc.contributor.school Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Health Sciences (UI)
dc.contributor.school Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record