Opin vísindi

Comment on “Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion”

Comment on “Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion”

Title: Comment on “Path to collapse for an isolated Néel skyrmion”
Author: Bessarab, Pavel
Date: 2017-04-24
Language: English
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
School: Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)
Department: Raunvísindastofnun (HÍ)
Science Institute (UI)
Series: Physical Review B;95(13)
ISSN: 2469-9950
2469-9969 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.136401
Subject: Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction; Magnetism; Skyrmions; Thin films; Condensed Matter & Materials Physics; Þéttefnisfræði; Segulmagn; Skammtasviðsfræði
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/535

Show full item record


Bessarab, P. F. (2017). Comment on ``Path to collapse for an isolated N\'eel skyrmion''. Physical Review B, 95(13), 136401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.136401


Rohart et al. [Phys. Rev. B 93, 214412 (2016)] recently reported calculations indicating two mechanisms for the annihilation of a skyrmion in a Co monolayer on Pt(111). The path calculations were based on a method presented in the Supplemental Material of their article. It is pointed out here that their method does not in general converge on minimum energy paths unlike the geodesic nudged elastic band method which is discussed for comparison. As a result, the maximum energy along the two paths presented does not provide an accurate estimate of the activation energy for the transition and the fact that two different paths were obtained should not be taken as an indication that the skyrmion annihilation can occur by two different mechanisms.


©2017 American Physical Society

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)