Opin vísindi

Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Atlason, Reynir Smari
dc.contributor.author Oddsson, Gudmundur V.
dc.contributor.author Unnthorsson, Runar
dc.date.accessioned 2017-12-19T13:31:00Z
dc.date.available 2017-12-19T13:31:00Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09-07
dc.identifier.citation Atlason, R. S., Oddsson, G. V., & Unnthorsson, R. (2017). Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 8(4), 283-291. doi:10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6
dc.identifier.issn 2008-9163
dc.identifier.issn 2251-6832 (eISSN)
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/482
dc.description.abstract Heat pumps use the temperature difference between inside and outside areas to modify a refrigerant, either for heating or cooling. Doing so can lower the need for external heating energy for a household to some extent. The eventual impact depends on various factors, such as the external source for heating or cooling and the temperature difference. The use of heat pumps, and eventual benefits has not been studied in the context of subarctic areas, such as in Iceland. In Iceland, only remote areas do not have access to district heating from geothermal energy where households may, therefore, benefit from using heat pumps. It is the intent of this study to explore the observed benefits of using heat pumps in Iceland, both financially and energetically. This study further elaborates on incentives provided by the Icelandic government. Real data were gathered from the Icelandic energy authority for the analysis. It was found for the study database of 128 households that the annual electricity use was reduced from 37.8 to 26.7 kWh (an average 29.3% reduction) after installation of heat pumps. Large pumps (9.0–14.4 kW) and small pumps (5.0–9.0 kW) saved an average of 31.4 and 26.0% (95% confidence intervals), respectively. On average, households used approximately 26 MWh after installing a heat pump. When installing a small pump (5–9 kW), the mean annual saving (and 95% confidence intervals) was 10.6 ( ±± 2.7) MWh (approximately 26%). However, when installing a larger pump, mean annual savings were 11.3 ( ±± 1.6) MWh (Approximately 31%).
dc.format.extent 283-291
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Springer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofseries International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering;8(4)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Energy efficiency
dc.subject Heat transfer
dc.subject Sustainability
dc.subject Orkusparnaður
dc.subject Varmaflutningur
dc.subject Sjálfbærni
dc.title Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dcterms.license This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6
dc.contributor.department Iðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)
dc.contributor.school Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu