Title: | Implementation and feasibility of the stroke nursing guideline in the care of patients with stroke: a mixed methods study |
Author: |
|
Advisor: | |
Date: | 2017-12 |
Language: | English |
Scope: | 72 |
University/Institute: | Háskóli Íslands University of Iceland |
School: | Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ) School of Health Sciences (UI) |
Department: | Hjúkrunarfræðideild (HÍ) Faculty of Nursing (UI) |
Series: | BMC Nursing;16(1) |
ISSN: | 1472-6955 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12912-017-0262-y |
Subject: | Stroke; Evidence based care; Clinical practice guidelines; Feasibility studies; Heilablóðfall; Hjúkrun; Gagnreynd hjúkrun |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/480 |
Citation:Bjartmarz, I., Jónsdóttir, H., & Hafsteinsdóttir, T. B. (2017). Implementation and feasibility of the stroke nursing guideline in the care of patients with stroke: a mixed methods study. BMC Nursing, 16(1), 72. doi:10.1186/s12912-017-0262-y
|
|
Abstract:Background: Nurses often have difficulties with using interdisciplinary stroke guidelines for patients with stroke as
they do not focus sufficiently on nursing. Therefore, the Stroke Nursing Guideline (SNG) was developed and
implemented. The aim of this study was to determine the implementation and feasibility of the SNG in terms of
changes in documentation and use of the guideline in the care of stroke patients on Neurological and Rehabilitation
wards, barriers and facilitators, and nurses’ and auxiliary nurses’ view of the implementation.
Methods: A sequential explorative mixed method design was used including pre-test post-test measures and post
intervention focus groups interviews. For the quantitative part retrospective electronic record data of nursing care was
collected from 78 patients and prospective measures with Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument (BFAI) and
Quality Indicator Tool (QIT) from 33 nursing staff including nurses and auxiliary nurses. In the qualitative part focus
groups interviews were conducted with nursing staff on usefulness of the SNG and experiences with implementation.
Results: Improved nursing documentation was found for 23 items (N = 37), which was significant for nine items
focusing mobility (p = 0.002, p = 0.024, p = 0.012), pain (p = 0.012), patient teaching (p = 0.001, p = 0.000) and discharge
planning (p = 0.000, p = 0.002, p = 0.004). Improved guideline use was found for 20 QIT-items (N = 30), with significant
improvement on six items focusing on mobility (p = 0.023), depression (p = 0.033, p = 0.025, p = 0.046, p = 0.046),
discharge planning (p = 0.012). Facilitating characteristics for change were significantly less for two of four BFAIsubscales,
namely Innovation (p = 0.019) and Context (p = 0.001), whereas no change was found for Professional and
Patient subscales. The findings of the focus group interviews showed the SNG to be useful, improving and providing
consistency in care. The implementation process was found to be successful as essential components of nursing
rehabilitation were defined and integrated into daily care.
Conclusion: Nursing staff found the SNG feasible and implementation successful. The SNG improved nursing care,
with increased consistency and more rigorous functional exercises than before. The SNG provides nurses and auxiliary
nurses with an important means for evidence based care for patients with stroke. Several challenges of implementing
this complex nursing intervention surfaced which mandates ongoing attention.
|