Opin vísindi

A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions

A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions

Title: A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions
Author: Robertson, Peter A.
Mill, Aileen
Novoa, Ana
Jeschke, Jonathan M.
Essl, Franz
Gallardo, Belinda
Geist, Juergen
Jarić, Ivan
Lambin, Xavier
Musseau, Camille
... 9 more authors Show all authors
Date: 2020-06-30
Language: English
Scope: 2633-2645
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
School: Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)
Department: Líf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)
Series: Biological Invasions;22(9)
ISSN: 1387-3547
1573-1464 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2
Subject: Containment; Eradication; Prevention; Líffræði
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2221

Show full item record


Robertson, P.A., Mill, A., Novoa, A. et al. A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biological Invasions 22, 2633–2645 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-020-02298-2


Managing the impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) is a great societal challenge. A wide variety of terms have been used to describe the management of invasive alien species and the sequence in which they might be applied. This variety and lack of consistency creates uncertainty in the presentation and description of management in policy, science and practice. Here we expand on the existing description of the invasion process to develop an IAS management framework. We define the different forms of active management using a novel approach based on changes in species status, avoiding the need for stand-alone descriptions of management types, and provide a complete set of potential management activities. We propose a standardised set of management terminology as an emergent feature of this framework. We identified eight key forms of management: (1) pathway management, (2) interception, (3) limits to keeping, (4) secure keeping, (5) eradication, (6) complete reproductive removal, (7) containment and (8) suppression. We recognise four associated terms: prevention; captive management; rapid eradication; and long-term management, and note the use of impact mitigation and restoration as associated forms of management. We discuss the wider use of this framework and the supporting activities required to ensure management is well-targeted, cost-effective and makes best use of limited resources.


Publisher's version (útgefin grein)


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)