Opin vísindi

A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Emami, Nargessadat
dc.contributor.author Heinonen, Jukka
dc.contributor.author Marteinsson, Björn
dc.contributor.author Säynäjoki, Antti
dc.contributor.author Junnonen, Juha-Matti Kalevi
dc.contributor.author Laine, Jani
dc.contributor.author Junnila, Seppo
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-28T11:09:30Z
dc.date.available 2020-05-28T11:09:30Z
dc.date.issued 2019-01-14
dc.identifier.citation Emami, N.; Heinonen, J.; Marteinsson, B.; Säynäjoki, A.; Junnonen, J.-M.; Laine, J.; Junnila, S. A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies. Buildings 2019, 9, 20.
dc.identifier.issn 2075-5309
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1854
dc.description Publisher's version (útgefin grein)
dc.description.abstract Traditionally, the emissions embodied in construction materials have not been considered important; however, they are becoming crucial due to the short time-frame in which the emissions should be reduced. Moreover, evaluating the environmental burden of construction materials has proven problematic and the reliability of the reported impact estimates is questionable. More reliable information from the construction sector is thus urgently needed to back and guide decision-making. Currently, the building sector environmental impact assessments predominantly employ commercial software with environmental impact databases and report results without knowledge about the impact of the software/database choice on the results. In this study, estimates for the embodied environmental impacts of residential construction from the two most widely used life cycle assessment (LCA) database-software combinations, ecoinvent with SimaPro software and GaBi, are compared to recognize the uniformities and inconsistencies. The impacts caused by two residential buildings of different types, a concrete-element multi-story residential building and a detached wooden house, both located in Finland, were assessed, including all building systems with a high level of detail. Based on the ReCiPe Midpoint method, fifteen impact categories were estimated and compared. The results confirm that the tool choice significantly affects the outcome. For the whole building, the difference is significant, around 15%, even in the most widely assessed category of Climate Change, and yields results that lean in different directions for the two cases. In the others, the estimates are entirely different, 40% or more in the majority of the categories and up to several thousand percentages of difference. The main conclusion is that extensive work is still urgently needed to improve the reliability of LCA tools in the building sector in order to provide reliable and trustworthy information for policy-making.
dc.description.sponsorship This research was funded by Landsvirkjun (The National Power Company in Iceland).
dc.format.extent 20
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher MDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseries Buildings;9(1)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Buildings
dc.subject Comparison
dc.subject Construction
dc.subject GaBi
dc.subject Life cycle assessment
dc.subject SimaPro
dc.subject Byggingarverkfræði
dc.subject Byggingar
dc.subject Byggingarefni
dc.subject Umhverfisáhrif
dc.subject Gagnasöfn
dc.title A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dcterms.license This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal Buildings
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/buildings9010020
dc.relation.url http://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/9/1/20/pdf
dc.contributor.department Umhverfis- og byggingarverkfræðideild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering (UI)
dc.contributor.school Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu