Opin vísindi

Functional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Program

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Morris, John N.
dc.contributor.author Berg, Katherine
dc.contributor.author Howard, Elizabeth P.
dc.contributor.author Jónsson, Pálmi V.
dc.contributor.author Craig, Meredith
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-30T15:24:50Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-30T15:24:50Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08
dc.identifier.citation Morris, John N, Berg, Katherine, Howard, Elizabeth P, Jonsson, Palmi V, & Craig, Meredith. (2019). Functional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Program., 30738824.
dc.identifier.issn 1525-8610
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1672
dc.description Publisher's version (útgefin grein)
dc.description.abstract Objective: To identify home care clients with substantial functional deficits who had capacity to improve and, thus, for whom recovery goals should be articulated. Design: Retrospective longitudinal analysis of an international home care database. Setting and participants: 523,907 persons receiving home care, having 2 assessments, on average, 8 months apart. Measures: Recovery algorithm variables included counts of dependencies of activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) tasks, hospitalization in the last 30 days, functional decline in the last 90 days, and self-belief in one's capacity to improve. Primary dependent variable was improvement in the IADL-ADL Functional Hierarchy Scale. Results: The Recovery Algorithm has 7 graded levels: the top 3 represent approximately 9% of home care clients, whereas the bottom level (where recovery is least likely to occur) includes 60% of home care clients (many with higher counts of extensive ADL or IADL dependencies). The improvement rates rise from 6.9% to 47.2% across the 7 levels of the algorithm. This relationship between change in IADL-ADL Functional Hierarchy Scale scores and Recovery Algorithm levels remained strong across age categories and cognitive performance levels. Higher rates of improvement occurred for persons who received physical therapy. Conclusions/Implications: The Recovery Algorithm is based on a mix of positive risk indicators and the person's challenged baseline functional status. For persons with higher scores on the algorithm, recovery is expected and should be considered in care plan goals. In addition, use of physical therapy increases the probability of recovery.
dc.description.sponsorship The authors remain grateful to interRAI.org and specifically the home care clients whose assessments provided the data for this project.
dc.format.extent 1001-1006
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of the American Medical Directors Association;20(8)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Assessment
dc.subject Functional recovery
dc.subject Home care
dc.subject InterRAI
dc.subject Recovery
dc.subject Heimahjúkrun
dc.subject Sjúklingar
dc.subject Batahorfur
dc.subject Reiknirit
dc.title Functional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Program
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dcterms.license This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.12.014
dc.contributor.department Læknadeild (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Medicine (UI)
dc.contributor.school Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Health Sciences (UI)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu