Opin vísindi

Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe

Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe

Title: Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe
Author: Supervia, Marta
Turk-Adawi, Karam
Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco
Pesah, Ella
Ding, Rongjing
Britto, Raquel R.
Bjarnason-Wehrens, Birna
Derman, Wayne
Abreu, Ana
Babu, Abraham S.
... 49 more authors Show all authors
Date: 2019-08
Language: English
Scope: 46-56
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands
University of Iceland
School: Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Health Sciences (UI)
Department: Læknadeild (HÍ)
Faculty of Medicine (UI)
Series: EClinicalMedicine;13
ISSN: 2589-5370
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.06.006
Subject: Cardiac rehabilitation; Global health; Health services; Nature; Preventive cardiology; Survey; Blóðrásarsjúkdómar; Endurhæfing; Kannanir; Heilsufar
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1667

Show full item record


Supervia, M. et al., 2019. Nature of Cardiac Rehabilitation Around the Globe. EClinicalMedicine, 13, pp.46–56.


Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a clinically-effective but complex model of care. The purpose of this study was to characterize the nature of CR programs around the world, in relation to guideline recommendations, and compare this by World Health Organization (WHO) region. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a piloted survey was administered online to CR programs globally. Cardiac associations and local champions facilitated program identification. Quality (benchmark of ≥ 75% of programs in a given country meeting each of 20 indicators) was ranked. Results were compared by WHO region using generalized linear mixed models. Findings: 111/203 (54.7%) countries in the world offer CR; data were collected in 93 (83.8%; N = 1082 surveys, 32.1% program response rate). The most commonly-accepted indications were: myocardial infarction (n = 832, 97.4%), percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 820, 96.1%; 0.10), and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 817, 95.8%). Most programs were led by physicians (n = 680; 69.1%). The most common CR providers (mean = 5.9 ± 2.8/program) were: nurses (n = 816, 88.1%; low in Africa, p < 0.001), dietitians (n = 739, 80.2%), and physiotherapists (n = 733, 79.3%). The most commonly-offered core components (mean = 8.7 ± 1.9 program) were: initial assessment (n = 939, 98.8%; most commonly for hypertension, tobacco, and physical inactivity), risk factor management (n = 928, 98.2%), patient education (n = 895, 96.9%), and exercise (n = 898, 94.3%; lower in Western Pacific, p < 0.01). All regions met ≥ 16/20 quality indicators, but quality was < 75% for tobacco cessation and return-to-work counseling (lower in Americas, p = < 0.05). Interpretation: This first-ever survey of CR around the globe suggests CR quality is high. However, there is significant regional variation, which could impact patient outcomes.


Publisher's version (útgefin grein)


This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)