Opin vísindi

Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review

Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review

Title: Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review
Author: Mačić, Vesna
Albano, Paolo G.
Almpanidou, Vasiliki
Claudet, Joachim
Corrales, Xavier
Essl, Franz
Evagelopoulos, Athanasios
Giovos, Ioannis
Jimenez, Carlos
Kark, Salit
... 13 more authors Show all authors
Date: 2018-05-25
Language: English
Scope: 178
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands (HÍ)
University of Iceland (UI)
Department: Rannsóknasetur á Vestfjörðum (HÍ)
Research Centre in the West Fjords (UI)
Series: Frontiers in Marine Science;5
ISSN: 2296-7745
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00178
Subject: Invasive alien species; Management actions; Mitigation; Non-indigenous species; Systematic conservation planning; Sjávarlíffræði; Dýr; Vistfræði
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1479

Show full item record


Maci ˇ c V, Albano PG, Almpanidou V, ´ Claudet J, Corrales X, Essl F, Evagelopoulos A, Giovos I, Jimenez C, Kark S, Markovic O, Mazaris AD, ´ Ólafsdóttir GÁ, Panayotova M, Petovic S, Rabitsch W, Ramdani M, ´ Rilov G, Tricarico E, Vega Fernández T, Sini M, Trygonis V and Katsanevakis S (2018) Biological Invasions in Conservation Planning: A Global Systematic Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 5:178. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00178


Biological invasions threaten biodiversity in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems, requiring substantial conservation and management efforts. To examine how the conservation planning literature addresses biological invasions and if planning in the marine environment could benefit from experiences in the freshwater and terrestrial systems, we conducted a global systematic review. Out of 1,149 scientific articles mentioning both “conservation planning” and “alien” or any of its alternative terms, 70 articles met our selection criteria. Most of the studies were related to the terrestrial environment, while only 10% focused on the marine environment. The main conservation targets were species (mostly vertebrates) rather than habitats or ecosystems. Apart from being mentioned, alien species were considered of concern for conservation in only 46% of the cases, while mitigation measures were proposed in only 13% of the cases. The vast majority of the studies (73%) ignored alien species in conservation planning even if their negative impacts were recognized. In 20% of the studies, highly invaded areas were avoided in the planning, while in 6% of the cases such areas were prioritized for conservation. In the latter case, two opposing approaches led to the selection of invaded areas: either alien and native biodiversity were treated equally in setting conservation targets, i.e., alien species were also considered as ecological features requiring protection, or more commonly invaded sites were prioritized for the implementation of management actions to control or eradicate invasive alien species. When the “avoid” approach was followed, in most of the cases highly impacted areas were either excluded or invasive alien species were included in the estimation of a cost function to be minimized. Most of the studies that followed a “protect” or “avoid” approach dealt with terrestrial or freshwater features but in most cases the followed approach could be transferred to the marine environment. Gaps and needs for further research are discussed and we propose an 11-step framework to account for biological invasions into the systematic conservation planning design.


Publisher's version (útgefin grein). The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars. 2018.00178/full#supplementary-material


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)