A review of biomass gasification modelling

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorSafarian, Sahar
dc.contributor.authorUnnthorsson, Runar
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Christiaan
dc.contributor.departmentIðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-20T13:43:09Z
dc.date.available2020-02-20T13:43:09Z
dc.date.issued2019-05-13
dc.descriptionPost-print (lokagerð höfundar)en_US
dc.description.abstractCurrently around 10% of all energy generated worldwide comes from biomass. Most of this 10% is biofuel energy from the fermentation of corn and sugarcane. Fermentation of corn competes with the global food supply, and fermentation of sugarcane drives deforestation. Therefore, the renewable and sustainable growth of these two bio-based energy sources may not be desirable even if it is economically feasible. Biomass gasification by contrast is significantly more flexible in terms of the bio-feedstock or waste that can be processed to either produce biofuels or to co-generate electricity and heat on demand. Fluidized bed and entrained flow gasifiers already achieve promising economy-of-scale for fuel production whilst downdraft gasifiers are well-suited for small-scale heat and power co-generation. This superior flexibility of gasification both in terms of the feedstock type and also the energy generation or fuel production options, is what drives expanding research and implementation opportunities for biomass gasification. Research progress is accelerated by modelling work. This review is the first review in the biomass gasification modelling field to collect and analyze statistics on the growing number of gasification modelling studies and approaches used. The frequency of the various modelling choices made, and the trends this data reveals, is reported. For new researchers this review provides a succinct guide to the modelling choices that needs to made early on in a modelling study or project. A detailed methodology characterization is introduced that includes consequential modelling choices not explicitly addressed by prior reviews. To seasoned researchers this study provides the first statistical (as opposed to ad hoc or anecdotal) picture of what their fellow researchers are doing.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRannís Technology Development Fund (project 175326-0611), the Icelandic Research Fund (grant 196458-051) and the Northern Periphery and Arctic program (project H-CHP 176)en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent378-391en_US
dc.identifier.citationSafarian, S., Unnþórsson, R., & Richter, C. (2019). A review of biomass gasification modelling. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 110, 378-391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.003en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.003
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321
dc.identifier.journalRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1544
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews;110
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomass Gasificationen_US
dc.subjectEquilibrium modelen_US
dc.subjectStoichiometric modelen_US
dc.subjectKinetic modelen_US
dc.subjectTaren_US
dc.subjectLífmassien_US
dc.subjectGas (eldsneyti)en_US
dc.subjectÚrganguren_US
dc.subjectLíkönen_US
dc.titleA review of biomass gasification modellingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseCC by 4.0en_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
Safarian et al post-print biomass gasification.pdf
Stærð:
1.29 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Post-print (lokagerð höfundar)

Undirflokkur