Deep Learning Forecasts a Strained Turbulent Flow Velocity Field in Temporal Lagrangian Framework: Comparison of LSTM and GRU

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorHassanian, Reza
dc.contributor.authorHelgadóttir, Ásdís
dc.contributor.authorRiedel, Morris
dc.contributor.departmentIðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-09T14:14:27Z
dc.date.available2022-11-09T14:14:27Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-03
dc.description.abstractThe subject of this study presents an employed method in deep learning to create a model and predict the following period of turbulent flow velocity. The applied data in this study are extracted datasets from simulated turbulent flow in the laboratory with the Taylor microscale Reynolds numbers in the range of 90 < Rλ< 110. The flow has been seeded with tracer particles. The turbulent intensity of the flow is created and controlled by eight impellers placed in a turbulence facility. The flow deformation has been conducted via two circular flat plates moving toward each other in the center of the tank. The Lagrangian particle-tracking method has been applied to measure the flow features. The data have been processed to extract the flow properties. Since the dataset is sequential, it is used to train long short-term memory and gated recurrent unit model. The parallel computing machine DEEP-DAM module from Juelich supercomputer center has been applied to accelerate the model. The predicted output was assessed and validated by the rest of the data from the experiment for the following period. The results from this approach display accurate prediction outcomes that could be developed further for more extensive data documentation and used to assist in similar applications. The mean average error and R2 score range from 0.001–0.002 and 0.9839–0.9873, respectively, for both models with two distinct training data ratios. Using GPUs increases the LSTM performance speed more than applications with no GPUs.en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent344en_US
dc.identifier.citationHassanian, R.; Helgadóttir, Á.; Riedel, M. Deep Learning Forecasts a Strained Turbulent Flow Velocity Field in Temporal Lagrangian Framework: Comparison of LSTM and GRU. Fluids 2022, 7, 344. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7110344en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7110344
dc.identifier.issn2311-5521
dc.identifier.journalFluidsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3592
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/951733en_US
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/951740en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFluids;7(11)
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/7/11/344/pdfen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluid Flow and Transfer Processesen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.subjectCondensed Matter Physicsen_US
dc.subjectTurbulent Flowen_US
dc.subjectDeep Learningen_US
dc.subjectEðlisfræðien_US
dc.titleDeep Learning Forecasts a Strained Turbulent Flow Velocity Field in Temporal Lagrangian Framework: Comparison of LSTM and GRUen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseCC BY 4.0en_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
fluids-07-00344.pdf
Stærð:
4.59 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version

Undirflokkur