Modeling of Hydrogen Production by Applying Biomass Gasification: Artificial Neural Network Modeling Approach

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorSafarian, Sahar
dc.contributor.authorEbrahimi Saryazdi, Seyed Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorUnnthorsson, Runar
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Christiaan
dc.contributor.departmentIðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-03T12:12:55Z
dc.date.available2021-05-03T12:12:55Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-01
dc.description.abstractIn order to accurately anticipate the proficiency of downdraft biomass gasification linked with a water–gas shift unit to produce biohydrogen, a model based on an artificial neural network (ANN) approach is established to estimate the specific mass flow rate of the biohydrogen output of the plant based on different types of biomasses and diverse operating parameters. The factors considered as inputs to the models are elemental and proximate analysis compositions as well as the operating parameters. The model structure includes one layer for input, a hidden layer and output layer. One thousand eight hundred samples derived from the simulation of 50 various feedstocks in different operating situations were utilized to train the developed ANN model. The established ANN in the case of product biohydrogen presents satisfactory agreement with input data: absolute fraction of variance (R2) is more than 0.999 and root mean square error (RMSE) is lower than 0.25. In addition, the relative impact of biomass properties and operating parameters on output are studied. At the end, to have a comprehensive evaluation, variations of the inputs regarding hydrogencontent are compared and evaluated together. The results show that almost all of the inputs show a significant impact on the smhydrogen output. Significantly, gasifier temperature, SBR, moisture content and hydrogen have the highest impacts on the smhydrogen with contributions of 19.96, 17.18, 15.3 and 10.48%, respectively. In addition, other variables in feed properties, like C, O, S and N present a range of 1.28–8.6% and proximate components like VM, FC and A present a range of 3.14–7.67% of impact on smhydrogen.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis paper was a part of the project funded by Icelandic Research Fund (IRF), (in Icelandic: Rannsoknasjodur) and the grant number is 196458-051.en_US
dc.format.extent71en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/fermentation7020071
dc.identifier.issn2311-5637
dc.identifier.journalFermentationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2564
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFermentation;7(2)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiomass gasificatioen_US
dc.subjectArtificial neural networken_US
dc.subjectHydrogen productionen_US
dc.subjectDowndraften_US
dc.subjectSimulationen_US
dc.subjectGaskennd efnien_US
dc.subjectHermilíkönen_US
dc.subjectOrkuframleiðslaen_US
dc.subjectLífmassien_US
dc.titleModeling of Hydrogen Production by Applying Biomass Gasification: Artificial Neural Network Modeling Approachen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
fermentation-07-00071.pdf
Stærð:
1.59 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Undirflokkur