Functional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Program

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorMorris, John N.
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Elizabeth P.
dc.contributor.authorJónsson, Pálmi V.
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Meredith
dc.contributor.departmentLæknadeild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Medicine (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolHeilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Health Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T15:24:50Z
dc.date.available2020-03-30T15:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2019-08
dc.descriptionPublisher's version (útgefin grein)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify home care clients with substantial functional deficits who had capacity to improve and, thus, for whom recovery goals should be articulated. Design: Retrospective longitudinal analysis of an international home care database. Setting and participants: 523,907 persons receiving home care, having 2 assessments, on average, 8 months apart. Measures: Recovery algorithm variables included counts of dependencies of activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) tasks, hospitalization in the last 30 days, functional decline in the last 90 days, and self-belief in one's capacity to improve. Primary dependent variable was improvement in the IADL-ADL Functional Hierarchy Scale. Results: The Recovery Algorithm has 7 graded levels: the top 3 represent approximately 9% of home care clients, whereas the bottom level (where recovery is least likely to occur) includes 60% of home care clients (many with higher counts of extensive ADL or IADL dependencies). The improvement rates rise from 6.9% to 47.2% across the 7 levels of the algorithm. This relationship between change in IADL-ADL Functional Hierarchy Scale scores and Recovery Algorithm levels remained strong across age categories and cognitive performance levels. Higher rates of improvement occurred for persons who received physical therapy. Conclusions/Implications: The Recovery Algorithm is based on a mix of positive risk indicators and the person's challenged baseline functional status. For persons with higher scores on the algorithm, recovery is expected and should be considered in care plan goals. In addition, use of physical therapy increases the probability of recovery.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors remain grateful to interRAI.org and specifically the home care clients whose assessments provided the data for this project.en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent1001-1006en_US
dc.identifier.citationMorris, John N, Berg, Katherine, Howard, Elizabeth P, Jonsson, Palmi V, & Craig, Meredith. (2019). Functional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Program., 30738824.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jamda.2018.12.014
dc.identifier.issn1525-8610
dc.identifier.journalJournal of the American Medical Directors Associationen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1672
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of the American Medical Directors Association;20(8)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectFunctional recoveryen_US
dc.subjectHome careen_US
dc.subjectInterRAIen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectHeimahjúkrunen_US
dc.subjectSjúklingaren_US
dc.subjectBatahorfuren_US
dc.subjectReikniriten_US
dc.titleFunctional Recovery Within a Formal Home Care Programen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseThis is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
1-s2.0-S1525861018307217-main.pdf
Stærð:
1.13 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version

Undirflokkur