Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorAtlason, Reynir Smari
dc.contributor.authorOddsson, Gudmundur V.
dc.contributor.authorUnnthorsson, Runar
dc.contributor.departmentIðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-19T13:31:00Z
dc.date.available2017-12-19T13:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-07
dc.description.abstractHeat pumps use the temperature difference between inside and outside areas to modify a refrigerant, either for heating or cooling. Doing so can lower the need for external heating energy for a household to some extent. The eventual impact depends on various factors, such as the external source for heating or cooling and the temperature difference. The use of heat pumps, and eventual benefits has not been studied in the context of subarctic areas, such as in Iceland. In Iceland, only remote areas do not have access to district heating from geothermal energy where households may, therefore, benefit from using heat pumps. It is the intent of this study to explore the observed benefits of using heat pumps in Iceland, both financially and energetically. This study further elaborates on incentives provided by the Icelandic government. Real data were gathered from the Icelandic energy authority for the analysis. It was found for the study database of 128 households that the annual electricity use was reduced from 37.8 to 26.7 kWh (an average 29.3% reduction) after installation of heat pumps. Large pumps (9.0–14.4 kW) and small pumps (5.0–9.0 kW) saved an average of 31.4 and 26.0% (95% confidence intervals), respectively. On average, households used approximately 26 MWh after installing a heat pump. When installing a small pump (5–9 kW), the mean annual saving (and 95% confidence intervals) was 10.6 ( ±± 2.7) MWh (approximately 26%). However, when installing a larger pump, mean annual savings were 11.3 ( ±± 1.6) MWh (Approximately 31%).en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent283-291en_US
dc.identifier.citationAtlason, R. S., Oddsson, G. V., & Unnthorsson, R. (2017). Heat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Iceland. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 8(4), 283-291. doi:10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40095-017-0244-6
dc.identifier.issn2008-9163
dc.identifier.issn2251-6832 (eISSN)
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/482
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering;8(4)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEnergy efficiencyen_US
dc.subjectHeat transferen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectOrkusparnaðuren_US
dc.subjectVarmaflutninguren_US
dc.subjectSjálfbærnien_US
dc.titleHeat pumps in subarctic areas: current status and benefits of use in Icelanden_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
10.1007%2Fs40095-017-0244-6.pdf
Stærð:
1.33 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version (útgefin grein)

Undirflokkur