Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorSmárason, Birgir Örn
dc.contributor.authorÖgmundarson, Ólafur
dc.contributor.authorArnason, Jon
dc.contributor.authorBjornsdottir, Rannveig
dc.contributor.authorDavidsdottir, Brynhildur
dc.contributor.departmentHagfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Economics (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLíf- og umhverfisvísindadeild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolFélagsvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Health Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-12T14:26:00Z
dc.date.available2018-03-12T14:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThis study utilized Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of 1 kg of live-weight Arctic char, cultivated in an Icelandic land-based aquaculture farm. The functional unit included assessments of three different feed types; standard feed with high inclusion levels of marine ingredients (Conv.), experimental feed with high inclusion levels of agricultural ingredients (ECO) and a hypothetical Black soldier fly larvae based feed (BSF). Results of the study indicated that the feed production causes the greatest environmental impacts from all feed types considered. The Black soldier fly based feed demonstrated the best environmental performance of the three feed types. Furthermore, it can be concluded that by increasing agriculture based ingredients at the cost of marine based ingredients, a better environmental performance can be reached. This study demonstrated the importance of feed production for aquaculture in terms of environmental impacts and showed that byoptimizing feed consumption, reducing the amount of fishmeal and fish oil and even creating new types of feed from novel ingredients, the overall impacts of aquaculture can be greatly reduced.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was conducted as a part of MSc studies in Environmental and Natural Resources at the University of Iceland, in collaboration with Matis ltd., Icelandic food and biotech R&D, which also funded the project. The authors are grateful for the financial and expert support provided by both entities. The authors would also like to thank the owner of the aquaculture company involved in the study, for clear and concise data provision, and also other companies that provided data for this study.en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.citationSmárason, B.Ö., Ögmundarson, Ó., Árnason, J., Björnsdóttir, R., & Davíðsdóttir, B. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Types. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 17, 79-90. http://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4194/1303-2712-v17_1_10
dc.identifier.issn1303-2712
dc.identifier.journalTurkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/623
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCentral Fisheries Research Institute, Trabzon, Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTurkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences;17(1)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAquacultureen_US
dc.subjectArctic charren_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectFishmeal replacementen_US
dc.subjectInsect feeden_US
dc.subjectFiskeldien_US
dc.subjectBleikjaen_US
dc.subjectFiskafóðuren_US
dc.titleLife Cycle Assessment of Icelandic Arctic Char Fed Three Different Feed Typesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
pdf_975.pdf
Stærð:
725.5 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version (útgefin grein)

Undirflokkur