On Solving the Poisson Equation with Discontinuities on Irregular Interfaces: GFM and VIM

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorHelgadottir, Asdis
dc.contributor.authorGuittet, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorGibou, Frédéric
dc.contributor.departmentIðnaðarverkfræði-, vélaverkfræði- og tölvunarfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Industrial Eng., Mechanical Eng. and Computer Science (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-01T10:38:45Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T10:38:45Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-17
dc.descriptionPublisher's version (útgefin grein)en_US
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the accuracy of two numerical methods for the variable coefficient Poisson equation with discontinuities at an irregular interface. Solving the Poisson equation with discontinuities at an irregular interface is an essential part of solving many physical phenomena such as multiphase flows with and without phase change, in heat transfer, in electrokinetics, and in the modeling of biomolecules’ electrostatics. The first method, considered for the problem, is the widely known Ghost-Fluid Method (GFM) and the second method is the recently introduced Voronoi Interface Method (VIM). The VIM method uses Voronoi partitions near the interface to construct local configurations that enable the use of the Ghost-Fluid philosophy in one dimension. Both methods lead to symmetric positive definite linear systems. The Ghost-Fluid Method is generally first-order accurate, except in the case of both a constant discontinuity in the solution and a constant diffusion coefficient, while the Voronoi Interface Method is second-order accurate in the -norm. Therefore, the Voronoi Interface Method generally outweighs the Ghost-Fluid Method except in special case of both a constant discontinuity in the solution and a constant diffusion coefficient, where the Ghost-Fluid Method performs better than the Voronoi Interface Method. The paper includes numerical examples displaying this fact clearly and its findings can be used to determine which approach to choose based on the properties of the real life problem in hand.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research of Á. Helgadóttir was supported by the University of Iceland Research Fund 2015 under HI14090070. The researches of A. Guittet and F. Gibou were supported in part by the NSF under DMS-1412695 and DMREF-1534264.en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent9216703en_US
dc.identifier.citationÁsdís Helgadóttir, Arthur Guittet, and Frédéric Gibou, “On Solving the Poisson Equation with Discontinuities on Irregular Interfaces: GFM and VIM,” International Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 2018, Article ID 9216703, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9216703.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2018/9216703
dc.identifier.issn1687-9643
dc.identifier.issn1687-9651 (eISSN)
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Differential Equationsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1086
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Limiteden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Differential Equations;2018
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTöluleg greiningen_US
dc.subjectStærðfræðileg tölfræðien_US
dc.titleOn Solving the Poisson Equation with Discontinuities on Irregular Interfaces: GFM and VIMen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
9216703.pdf
Stærð:
1.84 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version (útgefin grein)

Undirflokkur