Core competencies of clinical nurse specialists : A comparison across three Nordic countries

dc.contributorUniversity of Akureyri
dc.contributor.authorJokiniemi, Krista
dc.contributor.authorHølge-Hazelton, Bibi
dc.contributor.authorKristófersson, Gísli Kort
dc.contributor.authorFrederiksen, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorKilpatrick, Kelley
dc.contributor.authorMikkonen, Santtu
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-14T12:33:56Z
dc.date.available2025-11-14T12:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.descriptionFunding Information: This study received no specific external funding. During the study period, SM was supported by The Academy of Finland competitive funding to strengthen university research profiles (PROFI) for the University of Eastern Finland (grant no. 325022). Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.description.abstractAim To describe and compare the clinical nurse specialist core competency use in Finland, Denmark and Iceland. Background Clinical nurse specialist roles were first developed more than 60 years ago in the United States. Within the Nordic countries, the clinical nurse specialist role emerged around 2000. There is scarcity of clinical nurse specialist competency descriptions outside of North America, and research has been limited to examine or validate established competencies across different countries. Design A descriptive correlational study. Methods An online survey was conducted from May to September 2019. A population sample of clinical nurse specialists in Finland, Denmark and Iceland was recruited. A validated self-report questionnaire of clinical nurse specialist competencies was used. The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the STROBE checklist was used as the reporting guideline. Results A total sample of 184 clinical nurse specialists, 52 from Finland, 95 from Denmark and 37 from Iceland, participated in the study (response rate = 72%, 35% and 48%, respectively). Overall, clinical nurse specialists utilised the organisational competency most frequently followed by the patient, clinical nursing leadership and scholarship competency. Univariate analysis of variance test between-country effects showed statistically significant difference in patient competency (p = .000) and in organisational competency (p < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between counties in the utilisation of clinical nursing leadership and scholarship competency. Conclusion A small variability was found in the comparison of the clinical nurse specialist use of core competency in the spheres of patient, nursing, organisation and scholarship within three Nordic countries. Relevance to clinical practice The CNS competency scale may be utilised in benchmarking clinical nurse specialist roles and practice within and across countries. The long-term goal for the competency descriptions is to enhance the clinical nurse specialist role clarity, integration and evaluation as well as inform post-graduate education.is
dc.description.abstractAim: To describe and compare the clinical nurse specialist core competency use in Finland, Denmark and Iceland. Background: Clinical nurse specialist roles were first developed more than 60 years ago in the United States. Within the Nordic countries, the clinical nurse specialist role emerged around 2000. There is scarcity of clinical nurse specialist competency descriptions outside of North America, and research has been limited to examine or validate established competencies across different countries. Design: A descriptive correlational study. Methods: An online survey was conducted from May to September 2019. A population sample of clinical nurse specialists in Finland, Denmark and Iceland was recruited. A validated self-report questionnaire of clinical nurse specialist competencies was used. The data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the STROBE checklist was used as the reporting guideline. Results: A total sample of 184 clinical nurse specialists, 52 from Finland, 95 from Denmark and 37 from Iceland, participated in the study (response rate = 72%, 35% and 48%, respectively). Overall, clinical nurse specialists utilised the organisational competency most frequently followed by the patient, clinical nursing leadership and scholarship competency. Univariate analysis of variance test between-country effects showed statistically significant difference in patient competency (p =.000) and in organisational competency (p <.05). There were no statistically significant differences between counties in the utilisation of clinical nursing leadership and scholarship competency. Conclusion: A small variability was found in the comparison of the clinical nurse specialist use of core competency in the spheres of patient, nursing, organisation and scholarship within three Nordic countries. Relevance to clinical practice: The CNS competency scale may be utilised in benchmarking clinical nurse specialist roles and practice within and across countries. The long-term goal for the competency descriptions is to enhance the clinical nurse specialist role clarity, integration and evaluation as well as inform post-graduate education.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent10
dc.format.extent620339
dc.format.extent3601-3610
dc.identifier.citationJokiniemi, K, Hølge-Hazelton, B, Kristófersson, G K, Frederiksen, K, Kilpatrick, K & Mikkonen, S 2021, 'Core competencies of clinical nurse specialists : A comparison across three Nordic countries', Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 30, no. 23-24, pp. 3601-3610. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15882en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocn.15882
dc.identifier.issn0962-1067
dc.identifier.other29681982
dc.identifier.other024f358a-364b-496d-a1bf-366721c3f1b5
dc.identifier.other85107220683
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/5697
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Nursing; 30(23-24)en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107220683en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectbenchmarkingen
dc.subjectclinical nurse specialistsen
dc.subjectcomparativeen
dc.subjectcompetencyen
dc.subjectNordic countriesen
dc.subjectnurse clinicianen
dc.subjectNursesen
dc.subjectNursingen
dc.subjectCompetenceen
dc.subjectGeneral Nursingen
dc.subjectSDG 2 - Zero Hungeren
dc.subjectSDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitationen
dc.subjectSDG 3 - Good Health and Well-beingen
dc.subjectSDG 4 - Quality Educationen
dc.subjectSDG 1 - No Povertyen
dc.subjectSDG 5 - Gender Equalityen
dc.subjectSDG 10 - Reduced Inequalitiesen
dc.subjectSDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communitiesen
dc.subjectSDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Productionen
dc.subjectSDG 13 - Climate Actionen
dc.subjectSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren
dc.subjectSDG 15 - Life on Landen
dc.subjectSDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutionsen
dc.subjectSDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goalsen
dc.subjectSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energyen
dc.subjectSDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growthen
dc.subjectSDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructureen
dc.titleCore competencies of clinical nurse specialists : A comparison across three Nordic countriesen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/articleen

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
Journal_of_Clinical_Nursing_2021_Jokiniemi_Core_competencies_of_clinical_nurse_specialists_A_comparison_across_three.pdf
Stærð:
605.8 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format