A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorEmami, Nargessadat
dc.contributor.authorHeinonen, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorMarteinsson, Björn
dc.contributor.authorSäynäjoki, Antti
dc.contributor.authorJunnonen, Juha-Matti Kalevi
dc.contributor.authorLaine, Jani
dc.contributor.authorJunnila, Seppo
dc.contributor.departmentUmhverfis- og byggingarverkfræðideild (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T11:09:30Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T11:09:30Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-14
dc.descriptionPublisher's version (útgefin grein)en_US
dc.description.abstractTraditionally, the emissions embodied in construction materials have not been considered important; however, they are becoming crucial due to the short time-frame in which the emissions should be reduced. Moreover, evaluating the environmental burden of construction materials has proven problematic and the reliability of the reported impact estimates is questionable. More reliable information from the construction sector is thus urgently needed to back and guide decision-making. Currently, the building sector environmental impact assessments predominantly employ commercial software with environmental impact databases and report results without knowledge about the impact of the software/database choice on the results. In this study, estimates for the embodied environmental impacts of residential construction from the two most widely used life cycle assessment (LCA) database-software combinations, ecoinvent with SimaPro software and GaBi, are compared to recognize the uniformities and inconsistencies. The impacts caused by two residential buildings of different types, a concrete-element multi-story residential building and a detached wooden house, both located in Finland, were assessed, including all building systems with a high level of detail. Based on the ReCiPe Midpoint method, fifteen impact categories were estimated and compared. The results confirm that the tool choice significantly affects the outcome. For the whole building, the difference is significant, around 15%, even in the most widely assessed category of Climate Change, and yields results that lean in different directions for the two cases. In the others, the estimates are entirely different, 40% or more in the majority of the categories and up to several thousand percentages of difference. The main conclusion is that extensive work is still urgently needed to improve the reliability of LCA tools in the building sector in order to provide reliable and trustworthy information for policy-making.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by Landsvirkjun (The National Power Company in Iceland).en_US
dc.description.versionPeer Revieweden_US
dc.format.extent20en_US
dc.identifier.citationEmami, N.; Heinonen, J.; Marteinsson, B.; Säynäjoki, A.; Junnonen, J.-M.; Laine, J.; Junnila, S. A Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistencies. Buildings 2019, 9, 20.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings9010020
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.journalBuildingsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1854
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBuildings;9(1)
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/9/1/20/pdfen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBuildingsen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectConstructionen_US
dc.subjectGaBien_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectSimaProen_US
dc.subjectByggingarverkfræðien_US
dc.subjectByggingaren_US
dc.subjectByggingarefnien_US
dc.subjectUmhverfisáhrifen_US
dc.subjectGagnasöfnen_US
dc.titleA Life Cycle Assessment of Two Residential Buildings Using Two Different LCA Database-Software Combinations: Recognizing Uniformities and Inconsistenciesen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dcterms.licenseThis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
buildings-09-00020-v3.pdf
Stærð:
1.7 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Publisher´s version

Undirflokkur