Quantifying the Effect of Wind on Volcanic Plumes: Implications for Plume Modeling

dc.contributorHáskóli Íslandsen_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Icelanden_US
dc.contributor.authorDürig, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorGuðmundsson, Magnús T.
dc.contributor.authorDioguardi, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Louise Steffensen
dc.contributor.departmentRaunvísindastofnun (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentScience Institute (UI)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolVerkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)en_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-25T13:34:18Z
dc.date.available2023-01-25T13:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-13
dc.description.abstractThe considerable effects that wind can have on estimates of mass eruption rates (MERs) in explosive eruptions based on volcanic plume height are well known but difficult to quantify rigorously. Many explicitly wind-affected plume models have the additional difficulty that they require the use of centerline heights of bent-over plumes, a parameter not easily obtained directly from observational data. We tested two such models by using the time series of varying plume heights and windspeeds of the 2010 eruption. The mapped fallout and photos taken during this eruption allow us to estimate the plume geometry and to empirically constrain input parameters for the two models tested. Two strategies are presented to correct the difference in maximum plume height and centerline height: (a) based on plume radius, and (b) by using the plume type parameter Π, which quantifies the relative influence of buoyancy and cross-wind on the plume dynamics, to discriminate weak, intermediate and strong plumes. The results indicate that it may be more appropriate to classify plumes as either wind-dominated, intermediate or buoyancy-dominated, where the relative effects of both wind and MER define the type. The analysis of the Eyjafjallajökull data shows that the MER estimates from both models are considerably improved when a plume-type dependent centerline-correction is applied. For one model, we varied the wind entrainment coefficient β. For this particular eruption, we find that the best value for β lies between 0.28 and 0.36, unlike previous suggestions that set this parameter to 0.50.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipis
dc.description.sponsorshipIcelandic Research Fund. Grant number:206527-051is
dc.description.versionPre-print (óritrýnt handrit)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2022JD037781
dc.identifier.issn2169-897X
dc.identifier.issn2169-8996
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheresen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3899
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres;128(2)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSpace and Planetary Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)en_US
dc.subjectAtmospheric Scienceen_US
dc.subjectGeophysicsen_US
dc.subjectash plumesen_US
dc.subjectwind entrainmenten_US
dc.subjectLoftslagsfræðien_US
dc.subjectJarðeðlisfræðien_US
dc.subjectGosmökkuren_US
dc.titleQuantifying the Effect of Wind on Volcanic Plumes: Implications for Plume Modelingen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 2 af 2
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
jgrd58438_proof.pdf
Stærð:
3.04 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Pre-print
Hleð...
Thumbnail Image
Nafn:
Fylgiskjal f. post-print og pre-print.pdf
Stærð:
163.52 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

Undirflokkur