Opin vísindi

The beliefs about pros and cons of drinking and intention to change among hazardous and moderate alcohol users: a population-based cross-sectional study

The beliefs about pros and cons of drinking and intention to change among hazardous and moderate alcohol users: a population-based cross-sectional study


Titill: The beliefs about pros and cons of drinking and intention to change among hazardous and moderate alcohol users: a population-based cross-sectional study
Höfundur: Ansker, F. G.
Helgason, Asgeir R.   orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-3067
Ahacic, Kozma   orcid.org/0000-0002-7108-6775
Útgáfa: 2014-02-24
Tungumál: Enska
Umfang: 566-571
Háskóli/Stofnun: Háskólinn í Reykjavík (HR)
Reykjavík University (RU)
Svið: Viðskiptadeild (HR)
School of Business (RU)
Deild: Sálfræði (HR)
Psychology (RU)
Birtist í: The European Journal of Public Health;24(4)
ISSN: 1101-1262
1464-36X (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku007
Efnisorð: Transtheoretical model; Decisional balance; Brief interventions; Motivational model; Nonresponse bias; Primary-care; Readiness; Drinkers; Behavior; Health; Heilsufar; Áfengisneysla; Sálfræði
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/930

Skoða fulla færslu

Tilvitnun:

Ansker, F. G., Helgason, A. R., & Ahacic, K. (2014). The beliefs about pros and cons of drinking and intention to change among hazardous and moderate alcohol users: a population-based cross-sectional study. European Journal of Public Health, 24(4), 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku007

Útdráttur:

Background: Fundamental to supporting hazardous alcohol users are the rationales for reducing alcohol intake highlighted by the users themselves. This study analyses the relative importance of beliefs about pros and cons of drinking in relation to having an intention to reduce intake among both hazardous and moderate alcohol users. Methods: Intention to change was assessed in a representative sample of Stockholm's population (n = 4278, response rate 56.5%). Alcohol use was assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test measure. A decisional balance inventory was used to examine various beliefs about the pros and cons of drinking, which covered affect changes, social gains and losses, and possible adverse effects. Independent correlations were determined by logistic regression using a backward exclusion procedure (P > 0.05). Results: Higher ratings of importance were generally related to intent, whether or not the contrast was with having no intent or already having made a reduction. This was especially true for hazardous users. Only two beliefs were independently correlated with change among hazardous users: 'Drinking could get me addicted' and 'Drinking makes me more relaxed/less tense' (pseudo-R2 < 0.1). Among moderate users, there was no uniform pattern in the relationships. Conclusions: Unexpectedly, hazardous users with an intent to change rated pro arguments as more important than those with no intent to change. Of the investigated pros and cons, only a few were independently related to intention to change drinking behaviour. These arguments provide interesting topics in consultations. Little support was found for any rational decision making behind the intention to reduce alcohol intake.

Leyfi:

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com doi:10.1093/eurpub/cku007 Advance Access published on 24 February 2014

Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:


Fletta

Um vefinn

Reikningurinn minn