Title: | Death and Governmentality in Iceland: Neo-liberalism, Grief and the Nation-form |
Author: |
|
Date: | 2018 |
Language: | English |
University/Institute: | Háskóli Íslands University of Iceland |
School: | Félagsvísindasvið (HÍ) School of Social Sciences (UI) |
Department: | Félags- og mannvísindadeild (HÍ) Faculty of Social and Human Sciences (UI) |
ISBN: | 9789935231710 |
Subject: | Dauði; Sorg; Nýfrjálshyggja; Þjóðernisvitund; Þjóðfræði |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/683 |
Citation:Arnar Árnason, Sigurjón Baldur Hafsteinsson. (2018). Death and Governmentality in Iceland: Neo-liberalism, Grief and the Nation-form. Reykjavík: Háskólaútgáfan
|
|
Abstract:This book is a contribution to debates concerning the state of death in
the contemporary Western world. Taking up the argument that death
there has recently undergone a revival, the book problematizes the idea
that this revival is caused by general trends in society for example rising
individualism. The book describes a link between the revival of death in
Iceland and neo-liberal governmentality, in particular the machinery by
means of which modern citizens are enjoined to govern themselves.
The book draws on extensive ethnographic fieldwork on the changing
regimes of dying and grieving in Iceland since the year 2000. The
ethnography reflects how the old Icelandic solution of ‘locking death
away in a drawer’ is being replaced by an allegedly healthier option of
‘dealing openly’ with death and grief. The changes in the management of
death and grief in Iceland have taken place in the context of a neo-liberal
governmentality. The rise of neo-liberalism has been accompanied by a
rhetoric that emphasises self-reliance, personal responsibility and
individual initiative, private enterprise and personal improvement The
authors suggest that the changing regimes of death and grief should be
placed in this context. The book reflects on linkages between death and
grief, the fluctuating fortunes of the ‘nation form’ in Iceland and the
different ways in which political power can be legitimised through the
changing relations between ‘nation’, ‘state’ and ‘individual’.
|