Opin vísindi

A year of Covid-19 : Experiences and lessons learnt by small European island states - Cyprus, Iceland and Malta

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor.author Cuschieri, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Pallari, Elena
dc.contributor.author Hatziyianni, Amalia
dc.contributor.author Sigurvinsdottir, Rannveig
dc.contributor.author Sigfusdottir, Inga Dora
dc.contributor.author Sigurðardóttir, Árún Kristín
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-31T01:03:55Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-31T01:03:55Z
dc.date.issued 2022-04-01
dc.identifier.citation Cuschieri , S , Pallari , E , Hatziyianni , A , Sigurvinsdottir , R , Sigfusdottir , I D & Sigurðardóttir , Á K 2022 , ' A year of Covid-19 : Experiences and lessons learnt by small European island states - Cyprus, Iceland and Malta ' , European Journal of Public Health , vol. 32 , no. 2 , pp. 316-321 . https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab217
dc.identifier.issn 1101-1262
dc.identifier.other 57852127
dc.identifier.other 30b5bf95-8207-4072-88a3-87d3c596408f
dc.identifier.other 85128161511
dc.identifier.other 34978569
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3401
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract Background: COVID-19 became a global pandemic within weeks, as every country including small states and islands experienced a surge in cases. Small islands are known to face several challenges in the quest to curb the viral spread, but with the absence of land boarders and small population size, these factors should have played to their advantage to minimize the spread. The aim of this article was to compare and contrast the COVID19 situation, restrictions, preparedness, management and the healthcare systems between the small population island states of Cyprus, Iceland and Malta. Methods: Data were obtained from Ministry of Health websites and COVID dashboards of the three respective Island states in Europe. Comparisons were made between the reported cases, deaths, excess deaths, years of life lost, swabbing rates, restrictive measures, vaccination roll-out and healthcare system structures. Results: Cyprus and Malta contained the COVID-19 spread better than Iceland during the first wave. However, a significantly higher viral spread and mortality rates were observed in Malta during the second waves. Similar healthcare preparedness and services, restrictions and relaxation measures were implemented across the three islands with some exceptions. Covid-19 vaccination has initiated across all Islands with Malta leading the vaccination roll-out. Conclusion: The small population size and island status proved to be an asset during the first wave of COVID-19, but different governance approaches led to a different COVID-19 outcomes, including high mortality rates during the transition phases and the subsequent waves.
dc.description.abstract Background: COVID-19 became a global pandemic within weeks, as every country including small states and islands experienced a surge in cases. Small islands are known to face several challenges in the quest to curb the viral spread, but with the absence of land boarders and small population size, these factors should have played to their advantage to minimize the spread. The aim of this article was to compare and contrast the COVID-19 situation, restrictions, preparedness, management and the healthcare systems between the small population island states of Cyprus, Iceland and Malta. Methods: Data were obtained from Ministry of Health websites and COVID dashboards of the three respective Island states in Europe. Comparisons were made between the reported cases, deaths, excess deaths, years of life lost, swabbing rates, restrictive measures, vaccination roll-out and healthcare system structures. Results: Cyprus and Malta contained the COVID-19 spread better than Iceland during the first wave. However, a significantly higher viral spread and mortality rates were observed in Malta during the second waves. Similar healthcare preparedness and services, restrictions and relaxation measures were implemented across the three islands with some exceptions. Covid-19 vaccination has initiated across all Islands with Malta leading the vaccination roll-out. Conclusion: The small population size and island status proved to be an asset during the first wave of COVID-19, but different governance approaches led to a different COVID-19 outcomes, including high mortality rates during the transition phases and the subsequent waves.
dc.format.extent 6
dc.format.extent 758726
dc.format.extent 316-321
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries European Journal of Public Health; 32(2)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject COVID-19
dc.subject Smáríki
dc.subject Covid-19
dc.subject Europe
dc.subject Small states
dc.subject COVID-19/epidemiology
dc.subject Cyprus
dc.subject COVID-19 Vaccines
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Malta/epidemiology
dc.subject Iceland/epidemiology
dc.subject Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
dc.title A year of Covid-19 : Experiences and lessons learnt by small European island states - Cyprus, Iceland and Malta
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/eurpub/ckab217
dc.relation.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128161511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.contributor.department Department of Psychology
dc.contributor.school School of Health Sciences


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu