Opin vísindi

A life-cycle analysis of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Háskóli Íslands
dc.contributor University of Iceland
dc.contributor.author Sigurjónsson, Hafþór Ægir
dc.contributor.author Cook, David
dc.contributor.author Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur
dc.contributor.author Bogason, Sigurður G.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-16T14:00:05Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-16T14:00:05Z
dc.date.issued 2021-11
dc.identifier.citation Hafþór Ægir Sigurjónsson, David Cook, Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, Sigurður G. Bogason, A life-cycle analysis of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France, Renewable Energy, Volume 177, 2021, Pages 1076-1086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.013.
dc.identifier.issn 0960-1481
dc.identifier.issn 1879-0682 (eISSN)
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3180
dc.description.abstract The climate impacts of deep enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) have been understudied in the academic literature. Using life-cycle analysis (LCA) conducted in accordance with ISO 14040 and ISO 14044 standards, this paper explores the climate change impacts of two deep EGS. The first study was in Reykjanes, Iceland, where a single well, IDDP-2/DEEPEGS, was drilled to a depth of 4.6 km for the purposes of additional electricity production from an existing power plant. The second study involved two wells with side-tracks (depth > 5000 m), drilled to serve a new heat and power co-generation plant located on an old oil field site in Vendenheim, France. Climate change impacts for the sites were estimated in the range 1.6–17.4 gCO2e/kWh and 6.9–13.9 gCO2e/kWh for Reykjanes and Vendenheim, respectively. Although the EGS projects are very different, both outcomes are low when compared to non-renewable alternatives and akin to best-in-class renewable alternatives. The main impact at the Reykjanes demonstration site were the greenhouse gas emissions released from the borehole, an effect that could be avoided by carbon capture and storage/mineralisation/utilisation. In the case of Vendenheim, further reductions in emissions could be achieved via more extensive adoption of circular economy principles in design and procurement.
dc.format.extent 1076-1086
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Elsevier
dc.relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/690771
dc.relation.ispartofseries Renewable Energy;177
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Endurnýjanleg orka
dc.subject Sjálfbærni
dc.subject Renewable Energy
dc.subject Sustainability
dc.title A life-cycle analysis of deep enhanced geothermal systems – The case studies of Reykjanes, Iceland and Vendenheim, France
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal Renewable Energy
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.013
dc.contributor.department Umhverfis- og auðlindafræði (HÍ)
dc.contributor.department Environment and Natural Resources (UI)
dc.contributor.school Verkfræði- og náttúruvísindasvið (HÍ)
dc.contributor.school School of Engineering and Natural Sciences (UI)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu