Opin vísindi

Reconstructive aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018

Reconstructive aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018


Title: Reconstructive aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018
Author: Sailer, Irena
Mühlemann, Sven
Kohal, Ralf J.
Spies, Benedikt C.
Pjetursson, Bjarni Elvar   orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-5092
Lang, Niklaus P.
Gotfredsen, Klaus L.
Ellingsen, Jan E.
Francisco, Helena
Özcan, Mutlu
... 5 more authors Show all authors
Date: 2018-10
Language: English
Scope: 237-242
University/Institute: Háskóli Íslands (HÍ)
University of Iceland (UI)
School: Heilbrigðisvísindasvið (HÍ)
School of Health Sciences (UI)
Department: Faculty of Odontology (UI)
Tannlæknadeild (HÍ)
Series: Clinical Oral Implants Research;29
ISSN: 0905-7161
1600-0501 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1111/clr.13302
Subject: All-ceramic; Conventional workflow; Digital workflow; Fixed dental prostheses; Full-arch; Implant reconstructions; Lithium disilicate; Optical impressions; Single crown; Zirconia; Tannlækningar; Tannfyllingarefni
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1431

Show full item record

Citation:

Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Kohal RJ, et al. Reconstructive aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 3. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29(Suppl. 18):237–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/ clr.13302

Abstract:

Objectives: The tasks of this working group were to evaluate the existing evidence on the efficiency and efficacy of the digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed implant reconstructions, to assess the performance of all-ceramic fixed implant reconstructions and, finally, to evaluate the outcomes of internally and externally connected implant abutments and reconstructions. Methods: Four reviews were available analyzing the current literature on the respective topics. One review dealt with the efficiency and efficacy of digital and conventional fabrication workflows. Two reviews analyzed the outcomes of all-ceramic fixed implant reconstructions, one focusing on single-implant reconstructions and the other evaluating multiple-unit implant fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). The fourth review evaluated the clinical outcome on external, respectively, internal implant-abutment connections. These reviews were the basis for the discussions within the group and at the plenary sessions. Results: The present consensus report gives the consensus statements, the clinical recommendations, and the implications for future research as discussed and approved by the plenum of the consensus conference. The four manuscripts by Mühlemann et al., Rabel et al., Pieralli et al., and Pjetursson et al. are published as part of the journal supplement of the present EAO consensus conference.

Description:

Publisher's version (útgefin grein)

Rights:

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. © 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)