Opin vísindi

Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Title: Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Author: Lattari, Eduardo
Oliveira, Bruno R. R.
Monteiro Júnior, Renato Sobral
Marques Neto, Silvio Rodrigues
Oliveira, Aldair J.
Maranhão Neto, Geraldo A.
Machado, Sergio
Budde, Henning   orcid.org/0000-0002-7837-1990
Date: 2018-12-26
Language: English
Scope: e0209513
University/Institute: Háskólinn í Reykjavík
Reykjavik University
School: Tækni- og verkfræðideild (HR)
School of Science and Engineering (RU)
Department: Physical Activity, Physical Education, Health and Sport Research Centre (PAPESH) (RU)
Series: PLOS ONE;13(12)
ISSN: 1932-6203 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209513
Subject: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS); Muscle strength; Neuroscience; Muscle contraction; Strength training; Brain stimulation; Taugavísindi; Vöðvar; Styrktarþjálfun; Vöðvahreyfingar; Taugaboð; Íþróttafræði; Sport Science
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1334

Show full item record

Citation:

Lattari, E., Oliveira, B. R. R., Monteiro Júnior, R. S., Marques Neto, S. R., Oliveira, A. J., Maranhão Neto, G. A., … Budde, H. (2018). Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 13(12), e0209513. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209513

Abstract:

Previous studies investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on muscle strength showed no consensus. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature on the effects of single dose tDCS to improve muscle strength. A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMeb, ISI Web of Science, SciELO, and Scopus using search terms regarding tDCS and muscle strength. Studies were included in accordance with Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Setting (PICOS) including criteria. Healthy men and women, strength training practitioners or sedentary were selected. The acute effects of single dose anode stimulus of tDCS (a-tDCS) and the placebo stimulus of tDCS (sham) or no interventions were considered as an intervention and comparators, respectively. Measures related to muscle strength were analyzed. To conduct the analyses a weighted mean difference (WMD) and the standardized mean difference (SMD) were applied as appropriate. A total of 15 studies were included in this systematic review and 14 in meta-analysis. Regarding the maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC), a small effect was seen between tDCS and Sham with significant difference between the conditions (SMD = 0.29; CI95% = 0.05 to 0.54; Z = 2.36; p = 0.02). The muscular endurance measured by the seconds sustaining a percentage of MIVC demonstrated a large effect between tDCS and Sham (WMD = 43.66; CI95% = 29.76 to 57.55; Z = 6.16; p < 0.001), showing an improvement in muscular endurance after exposure to tDCS. However, muscular endurance based on total work showed a trivial effect between tDCS and Sham with no significant difference (SMD = 0.22; CI95% = -0.11 to 0.54; Z = 1.32, p = 0.19). This study suggests that the use of tDCS may promote increase in maximal voluntary contraction and muscular endurance through isometric contractions.

Rights:

© 2018 Lattari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)