Opin vísindi

Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping

Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping


Title: Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping
Author: Sklett, Vegard H.
Lorås, Håvard W.
Sigmundsson, Hermundur   orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-5711
Date: 2018-07-17
Language: English
Scope: 1215
University/Institute: Háskólinn í Reykjavík
Reykjavik University
School: Tækni- og verkfræðideild (HR)
School of Science and Engineering (RU)
Department: Íþróttafræði (HR)
Sport Science (RU)
Series: Frontiers in Psychology;9
ISSN: 1664-1078 (eISSN)
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01215
Subject: Self-efficacy; Flow; Positive affect; Negative affect; Worry; Ski jumping; Performance; Athletic Performance; Athletes; Sports; Sjálfstraust; Áhrif (sálfræði); Áhyggjur; Skíðastökk; Frammistöðumat; Íþróttafólk; Keppnisíþróttir
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1318

Show full item record

Citation:

Sklett, V. H., Loras, H. W., & Sigmundsson, H. (2018). Self-Efficacy, Flow, Affect, Worry and Performance in Elite World Cup Ski Jumping. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01215

Abstract:

The present study investigated the relationship between self-efficacy, flow, positive-and negative affect, worry and ski jumping performance, as well as the degree of influence these psychological factors have on ski jumping performance in specific competitions and overall World Cup ranking. World Cup ski jumpers (N = 40) responded to four questionnaires in the middle of the World Cup season, reporting their subjective experience during a competitive setting over a period of three consecutive days. Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Flow Theory was used as main conceptual frameworks. Self-efficacy was moderately related to ski jumping performance, both overall World Cup ranking (r = -0.37) and the results from the first out of three individual ski flying competitions (r = -0.36) and explained approximately 14% of the variance in the overall World Cup. Flow was moderately related to ski jumping performance, both overall World Cup ranking (Flow-Focus) (r = -0.34), and individual ski flying results from the first competition (Flow-Arousal) (r = -0.36). The Flow-Arousal explained approximately 13% of the variance in ski flying results. Worry was highly related to ski jumping performance in the second (r = 0.60) and third (r = 0.52) competition, indicating that approximately 36 and 27% of the variance in ski flying results could be accounted for by levels of worry, respectively. Negative affect was moderately related to ski flying performance (r = 0.34). These results show that psychological factors that regulate emotional states may be of importance for World Cup ski jumping performance, and that appropriate coping strategies, constructive mindset and motivation, appears to be essential in this regard. To our knowledge, this is the first study on the relationship between these psychological factors and ski jumping performance among World Cup athletes. The study adds important information about some of the dynamic features of emotional and psychological mechanisms involved during elite ski jumping performance.

Rights:

Copyright © 2018 Sklett, Lorås and Sigmundsson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)