Opin vísindi

Qualitative case study of needle exchange programs in the Central Appalachian region of the United States

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor Reykjavík University (RU)
dc.contributor Háskólinn í Reykjavík (HR)
dc.contributor.author Davis, Stephen M.
dc.contributor.author Davidov, Danielle
dc.contributor.author Kristjansson, Alfgeir
dc.contributor.author Zullig, Keith
dc.contributor.author Baus, Adam
dc.contributor.author Fisher, Melanie
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-26T10:32:30Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-26T10:32:30Z
dc.date.issued 2018-10-12
dc.identifier.citation Davis, S. M., Davidov, D., Kristjansson, A. L., Zullig, K., Baus, A., & Fisher, M. (2018). Qualitative case study of needle exchange programs in the Central Appalachian region of the United States. Plos One, 13(10), e0205466. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205466
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1201
dc.description Publisher's version (útgefin grein)
dc.description.abstract Background The Central Appalachian region of the United States is in the midst of a hepatitis C virus epidemic driven by injection of opioids, particularly heroin, with contaminated syringes. In response to this epidemic, several needle exchange programs (NEP) have opened to provide clean needles and other supplies and services to people who inject drugs (PWID). However, no studies have investigated the barriers and facilitators to implementing, operating, and expanding NEPs in less populous areas of the United States. Methods This qualitative case study consisted of interviews with program directors, police chiefs, law enforcement members, and PWID affiliated with two NEPs in the rural state of West Virginia. Interview transcripts were coded inductively and analyzed using qualitative data analysis software. Final common themes related to barriers and facilitators of past program openings, current program operations, and future program plans, were derived through a consensus of two data coders. Results Both NEPs struggled to find existing model programs, but benefited from broad community support that facilitated implementation. The largest operational barrier was the legal conundrum created by paraphernalia laws that criminalize syringe possession. However, both PWID and law enforcement appreciated the comprehensive services provided by these programs. Program location and transportation difficulties were additional noted barriers. Future program operations are threatened by funding shortages and bans, but necessitated by unexpected program demand. Conclusion Despite broad community support, program operations are threatened by growing participant volumes, funding shortages, and the federal government's prohibition on the use of funds to purchase needles. Paraphernalia laws create a legal conundrum in the form of criminal sanctions for the possession of needles, which may inadvertently promote needle sharing and disease transmission. Future studies should examine additional barriers to using clean needles provided by rural NEPs that may blunt the effectiveness of NEPs in preventing disease transmission.
dc.description.sponsorship NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
dc.format.extent e0205466
dc.language.iso en
dc.publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.ispartofseries Plos One;13(10)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Sálfræði
dc.subject Psychology
dc.subject
dc.subject
dc.subject.mesh Injection drug use
dc.subject.mesh Hepatitis C
dc.subject.mesh Syringe exchange
dc.subject.mesh Global epidemiology
dc.subject.mesh Economic burden
dc.subject.mesh Prevention
dc.subject.mesh Disease
dc.subject.mesh Implementation
dc.subject.mesh Participation
dc.title Qualitative case study of needle exchange programs in the Central Appalachian region of the United States
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dcterms.license : © 2018 Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.description.version Peer Reviewed
dc.identifier.journal Plos One
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0205466
dc.relation.url http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205466
dc.contributor.school School of Business (RU)
dc.contributor.school Viðskiptadeild (HR)


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu