Opin vísindi

 

Nýlega bætt við

Verk
Relapse in disordered gambling : a systematic review from a biopsychosocial perspective
(2026-05-07) Torrance, Jamie; Quigley, Martyn; Heath, Conor; Cousins, Alecia; Dighton, Glen; Wright, Simon; Dymond, Simon; Newall, Philip; Department of Psychology
Background: Relapse is common among individuals undergoing treatment for gambling disorder (GD). Understanding the biological, psychological, and social (biopsychosocial (BPS)) factors that influence relapse in GD is important to guide clinical practice and improve treatment efficacy. However, evidence synthesis in this area is warranted to provide clarity and cohesion to the literature. Method: A systematic review of empirical research (2015–2026) was conducted. Included studies focused on factors that either predicted relapse in GD, or those that offered protection against relapse. Findings were synthesized according to the BPS model (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024521445). Results: Twenty-six studies were included in the review. Overall, studies lacked heterogeneity, with most conducted in Spain (n = 19) and deriving from the same participant groups (n = 14). Biological factors such as younger age were associated with higher rates of GD relapse. Psychological predictors encompassed alcohol/substance use, personality traits (higher harm avoidance and lower self-directedness), cognitive factors (cognitive distortions, low cognitive flexibility, impulsivity), and poor psychopathological state. Social factors such as marital status (being single, divorced, or separated), lower education levels, involvement in crime, and exposure to gambling advertising also contributed to relapse risk. Relatedly, familial support, engaging in meaningful activities, and attendance at self-help meetings were protective against relapse. Conclusions: Overall, a broad range of BPS factors influence GD relapse. Despite the lack of heterogeneity in the included studies, these findings may contribute to better therapeutic understanding and practice. Expanding this research area is crucial for improving long-term recovery outcomes in GD.
Verk
(Mis)Comprehension and (Mistaken) Attractiveness of Financial Gambling Inducements among UK Bettors
(2026-03-25) Torrance, Jamie; Wright, Simon; Newall, Philip; Crawford, Tomos; Quigley, Martyn; Dymond, Simon; Department of Psychology
Financial gambling inducements such as ‘free’ bets and welcome bonuses involve complex wagering requirements that many consumers miscomprehend. UK regulations cap these wagering requirements at x10 (i.e., users must wager x10 the bonus before withdrawal) but don’t require worked examples to aid comprehension. This study assessed UK bettors’ comprehension of inducement wagering requirements, whether comprehension varied by gambling severity, whether perceived attractiveness differed when worked examples were displayed, and bettors’ broader perceptions of inducements. A between-subjects, mixed-methods online experiment randomised UK bettors (n = 585) to view a welcome bonus inducement either with or without (control) a worked example detailing its wagering requirement. Participants completed measures of comprehension, perceived attractiveness, gambling severity, and qualitative questioning. Participants in the control condition significantly underestimated the inducement’s wagering requirements (p<.001, r=.94), with a median estimate of £500 versus the correct value of £750. Underestimation did not differ by gambling severity. The inducement was rated significantly less attractive (p<.001, η²=.18) when the worked example was displayed (M = 2.39, SD = 1.46) compared to the control (M = 3.75, SD = 1.48). However, this effect was moderated by gambling severity (B=-0.112, p=.005), with the reduction in perceived attractiveness associated with the worked example becoming smaller as gambling severity scores increased. Qualitative analysis identified three overarching perceptions of inducements: as manipulative, economically worthless, and requiring better regulation. UK bettors significantly underestimate inducements’ wagering requirements, while worked examples significantly reduce their mistaken attractiveness. These findings demonstrate how informed choice can be enhanced via worked examples.
Verk
Lost in translation? Not anymore : a Mokken scale analysis of the revised Icelandic translation of the PHQ-9
(2026-01-20) Jóns, Laufey Ósk; Kristófersdóttir, Kristín Hulda; Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka; Kristjánsdóttir, Hafrún; Karlsson, Thorlakur; Thorsdottir, Fanney; Department of Sport Science; Department of Psychology
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is among the most widely used self-report instruments for assessing depressive symptoms. Although previously translated into Icelandic and widely adopted in clinical and research contexts, recent studies identified notable translation issues that may have affected its psychometric quality. This study examined a revised Icelandic version of the PHQ-9, designed to improve clarity and fidelity to the original English version. A general population sample (n = 139) completed the revised version in an online survey. Mokken scale analysis was conducted to evaluate scalability, monotonicity, local independence, and invariant item ordering. Results indicated that the revised version demonstrated stronger psychometric properties compared to the original translation. The overall scalability coefficient suggested a strong scale (H =.548) according to Mokken’s criteria; however, the confidence interval (95% CI [.466,.630]) crossed.50, indicating that strong scalability cannot be guaranteed at the population level. All items surpassed the conventional.30 benchmark, with most achieving Hi ≥.50. No significant violations of monotonicity were observed, and only minor indications of negative local dependence emerged. While partial evidence for invariant item ordering was found, it remained limited. These findings suggest that the revised Icelandic PHQ-9 is a more internally consistent and interpretable assessment of depression severity, broadly comparable to findings reported in other language versions. The scale appears suitable for use in research settings and for screening purposes in Iceland, although further validation in clinical populations is needed.
Verk
Intolerance of uncertainty and its impact on university students’ confidence, awareness and experience with employer selection tests
(2026-07-14) Quigley, Martyn; Kamenova, Zdravka; Blackmore, Maya; Dymond, Simon; Bradley, Alex; Department of Psychology
Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is a disposition typified by negative reactions to uncertainty and may influence how university students engage with career development opportunities. IU can be ‘Prospective’ or ‘Inhibitory’. Prospective IU is characterised by a ‘desire for predictability’, whilst Inhibitory IU is characterised by inaction due to ‘uncertainty paralysis’. In this study, we surveyed 568 students to examine whether Inhibitory and Prospective IU (as measured by the IUS-12) were associated with students’ attendance at careers’ events and their awareness of, and confidence and experience with, commonly used graduate employer selection tests. Results revealed that higher inhibitory IU scores were associated with lower awareness, confidence and experience with employer selection tests but not attendance levels. Prospective IU scores were positively associated with confidence and experience levels. These novel findings demonstrate that IU is a factor impacting on students’ employability. Recognising the role of inhibitory IU and cultivating a tolerance to uncertainty may help to improve students’ employability.
Verk
Gender bias in lending-based crowdfunding : the case of technology development projects
(2026-08-23) Eriksson, Victoria; Ek, Kristina; Lazarczyk Carlson, Ewa; Söderholm, Patrik; Department of Business and Economics
The purpose of the paper is to investigate whether lending crowdfunding offers equal opportunities for female and male entrepreneurs in the context of a technology demonstration project. The analysis recognises the potential role of signalling, i.e. suggesting that any success in attracting funding may not only be contingent on gender per se, but also on how signals from women and men concerning the various project attributes will be interpreted. We design a split-sample discrete choice experiment that, apart from financial factors, consider two quality signals: private co-funding and downstream actor collaboration. Data are collected through a survey of over 2000 Swedish individuals and analysed using mixed logit models. Overall, the results indicate little gender bias against women in the case of a (characteristically) male-dominated technological development project. We find very limited evidence suggesting that any of the two project quality signals are perceived differently based on the project owner’s gender. Still, the results show that male lenders place a larger premium on actor collaboration when the project owner is female. On the whole, our findings indicate that lending crowdfunding could potentially help democratize the access to capital and reduce any existing funding obstacles for women.

Flokkar í Opnum vísindum

Veldu flokk til að skoða.

Niðurstöður 1 - 9 af 9