Validation-Aware Surrogate Shortlisting for Biomedical Microwave Imaging : Analytical Performance and FDTD Transfer
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Lulu | |
| dc.contributor.department | Department of Engineering | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-09-14T10:50:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-09-14T10:50:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-08 | |
| dc.description | Publisher Copyright: © 2026 by the author. | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Broadband antenna, frequency and channel selection requires efficient prioritisation of finite candidate configurations, yet strong surrogate performance within a simplified analytical model does not ensure that the learned ordering will transfer to another electromagnetic representation. This study developed a validation-aware surrogate-shortlisting framework using a controlled breast-mimetic benchmark comprising 120 scenarios and 80 antenna–frequency–channel candidates per scenario. Surrogate models were developed using grouped scenario-level validation, and the model and five-candidate shortlist policy were frozen before external evaluation. Random forest produced the lowest-regret analytical-domain shortlist and remained stable across model-initialisation seeds. The frozen ranking was then challenged on held-out scenarios using a separately implemented restricted two-dimensional transverse-magnetic finite-difference time-domain model. Although numerical-reference checks supported shortlist-level use of the operational grid, candidate ordering did not transfer reliably: optimum inclusion, shortlist agreement and rank association were weak, although a qualified candidate within 2 mm of the finite-library FDTD optimum was retained in 58.3% of cases. Transfer failure varied by frequency band and channel family, while incomplete alignment between the analytical and FDTD candidate libraries prevented attribution of the discrepancy to electromagnetic-model shift alone. The framework therefore positions analytical surrogates as auditable shortlisting tools that reduce downstream candidate-level assessment while retaining independent electromagnetic evaluation before final design selection. | en |
| dc.description.version | Peer reviewed | en |
| dc.format.extent | 3191788 | |
| dc.format.extent | ||
| dc.identifier.citation | Wang, L 2026, 'Validation-Aware Surrogate Shortlisting for Biomedical Microwave Imaging : Analytical Performance and FDTD Transfer', Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 15, no. 16, 3561. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15163561 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/electronics15163561 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2079-9292 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 250816217 | |
| dc.identifier.other | 2b47348f-36ed-4311-85f2-1c424fba096f | |
| dc.identifier.other | 105048317328 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/8263 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Electronics (Switzerland); 15(16) | en |
| dc.relation.url | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105048317328 | en |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
| dc.subject | 2-D TM FDTD | en |
| dc.subject | analytical-to-FDTD transfer | en |
| dc.subject | antenna-array design | en |
| dc.subject | biomedical microwave imaging | en |
| dc.subject | breast-mimetic benchmark | en |
| dc.subject | candidate shortlisting | en |
| dc.subject | model shift | en |
| dc.subject | surrogate modelling | en |
| dc.subject | Control and Systems Engineering | en |
| dc.subject | Signal Processing | en |
| dc.subject | Hardware and Architecture | en |
| dc.subject | Computer Networks and Communications | en |
| dc.subject | Electrical and Electronic Engineering | en |
| dc.title | Validation-Aware Surrogate Shortlisting for Biomedical Microwave Imaging : Analytical Performance and FDTD Transfer | en |
| dc.type | /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article | en |
Skrár
Original bundle
1 - 1 af 1
- Nafn:
- electronics-15-03561-with-cover.pdf
- Stærð:
- 3.04 MB
- Snið:
- Adobe Portable Document Format