Does overreaching from endurance-based training impair sleep : A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Conor
dc.contributor.authorSvansdottir, Steinunn Anna
dc.contributor.authorDupuy, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorLouis, Julien
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-15T11:14:01Z
dc.date.available2026-10-15T11:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2024 Murphy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.description.abstractBackground Overreaching is often linked to a deterioration in sleep quality, yet a comprehensive review is lacking. The aim of this systemic review and meta-analysis was to synthesise the literature and quantify the effect of overreaching from endurance-based training on sleep quality. Method The review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The final search was conducted in May 2023 using four electronic databases (Web of Science Core Collection, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Database, SPORTDiscus). Studies were included for a qualitative review, while random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for objective and subjective sleep. Results and discussion The search returned 805 articles. Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review; Three and eight articles were eligible for the meta-analyses (objective and subjective, respectively). On average, the overreaching protocols were sixteen days in length (6 to 28 days) and included exercise modalities such as cycling (number of studies [k] = 5), rowing (k = 4), triathlon (k = 3), running (k = 2), and swimming (k = 1). Actigraphy was the only form of objective sleep measurement used across all studies (k = 3), while various instruments were used to capture subjective sleep quality (k = 13). When comparing objective sleep quality following the overreaching intervention to baseline (or a control), there was a significant reduction in sleep efficiency (mean difference = -2.0%; 95% CI -3.2, -0.8%; Glass' Δ = -0.83; p < 0.01). In contrast, when comparing subjective sleep quality following the overreaching intervention to baseline (or a control), there was no effect on subjective sleep quality (Glass' Δ = -0.27; 95% CI -0.79, 0.25; p = 0.08). Importantly, none of the included studies were judged to have a low risk of bias. While acknowledging the need for more high-quality studies, it appears that overreaching from endurance-based training can deteriorate objective sleep without influencing the perception of sleep quality.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent1855455
dc.format.extent
dc.identifier.citationMurphy, C, Svansdottir, S A, Dupuy, O & Louis, J 2024, 'Does overreaching from endurance-based training impair sleep : A systematic review and meta-analysis', PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 5 May, e0303748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303748en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0303748
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.other251342217
dc.identifier.other5c37e37c-4f79-4400-8df2-ed43de2381ff
dc.identifier.other85194883439
dc.identifier.other38809828
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/8768
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE; 19(5 May)en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85194883439en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectMultidisciplinaryen
dc.titleDoes overreaching from endurance-based training impair sleep : A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/articleen

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
journal.pone.0303748.pdf
Stærð:
1.77 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format