The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) parent-report : bifactor structure and method effects in a community-based sample

dc.contributor.authorThorlacius, Örnólfur
dc.contributor.authorValborgarson, Auðun
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-12T13:44:04Z
dc.date.available2026-10-12T13:44:04Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-19
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.en
dc.description.abstractThe Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used screening measure for child mental health, yet findings regarding its latent structure have been inconsistent. The present study examined the structural validity of the SDQ parent-report in a large community sample of mothers of Icelandic children aged 6–12 years (N = 2332). Competing measurement models were evaluated, including the original five-factor structure, second-order and bifactor models, estimated with and without a method factor capturing covariance among positively worded items. Model comparisons indicated that a bifactor model including two broad general factors—Externalizing and Internalizing problems—together with a Prosocial Behavior factor and an orthogonal wording-related method factor provided the most interpretable representation. The Externalizing (ωH = 0.69; ECV = 0.65) and Internalizing (ωH = 0.58; ECV = 0.55) factors accounted for a substantial proportion of reliable variance among the symptom-based items, whereas the specific SDQ factors, particularly Conduct Problems and Peer Problems, contributed relatively limited variance beyond these broader factors. The wording method factor accounted for a notable share of covariance among positively worded items, particularly those from the Prosocial Behavior domain, consistent with structured wording-related variance. Sensitivity analyses using alternative specifications, including exploratory structural equation modeling and a random-intercept factor approach, yielded converging results. The findings highlight the influence of wording-related covariance and skewed and restricted response distributions, underscoring the importance of accounting for these sources of variance when interpreting SDQ scores. Broad Internalizing and Externalizing scores may therefore provide more stable indicators of child mental health difficulties in non-clinical populations.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent1342760
dc.format.extent
dc.identifier.citationThorlacius, Ö & Valborgarson, A 2026, 'The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) parent-report : bifactor structure and method effects in a community-based sample', Nordic Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2026.2655128en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19012276.2026.2655128
dc.identifier.issn1901-2276
dc.identifier.other250817949
dc.identifier.other9914f5c6-7365-409a-b4e4-ad5970d33fd4
dc.identifier.other105036040376
dc.identifier.otherunpaywall: 10.1080/19012276.2026.2655128
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/8703
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNordic Psychology; ()en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105036040376en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectbifactor analysisen
dc.subjectchild psychopathologyen
dc.subjectparent ratingsen
dc.subjectStrengths and Difficulties Questionnaireen
dc.subjectwording effectsen
dc.subjectGeneral Psychologyen
dc.titleThe Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) parent-report : bifactor structure and method effects in a community-based sampleen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/articleen

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
The_Strengths_and_Difficulties_Questionnaire_SDQ_parent-report_bifactor_structure_and_method_effects_in_a_community-based_sample.pdf
Stærð:
1.28 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format