Discriminating between rival biochemical network models : Three approaches to optimal experiment design

dc.contributor.authorMélykúti, Bence
dc.contributor.authorAugust, Elias
dc.contributor.authorPapachristodoulou, Antonis
dc.contributor.authorEl-Samad, Hana
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Engineering
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-03T10:26:00Z
dc.date.available2026-09-03T10:26:00Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: The success of molecular systems biology hinges on the ability to use computational models to design predictive experiments, and ultimately unravel underlying biological mechanisms. A problem commonly encountered in the computational modelling of biological networks is that alternative, structurally different models of similar complexity fit a set of experimental data equally well. In this case, more than one molecular mechanism can explain available data. In order to rule out the incorrect mechanisms, one needs to invalidate incorrect models. At this point, new experiments maximizing the difference between the measured values of alternative models should be proposed and conducted. Such experiments should be optimally designed to produce data that are most likely to invalidate incorrect model structures.Results: In this paper we develop methodologies for the optimal design of experiments with the aim of discriminating between different mathematical models of the same biological system. The first approach determines the 'best' initial condition that maximizes the L2 (energy) distance between the outputs of the rival models. In the second approach, we maximize the L2-distance of the outputs by designing the optimal external stimulus (input) profile of unit L2-norm. Our third method uses optimized structural changes (corresponding, for example, to parameter value changes reflecting gene knock-outs) to achieve the same goal. The numerical implementation of each method is considered in an example, signal processing in starving Dictyostelium amœbæ.Conclusions: Model-based design of experiments improves both the reliability and the efficiency of biochemical network model discrimination. This opens the way to model invalidation, which can be used to perfect our understanding of biochemical networks. Our general problem formulation together with the three proposed experiment design methods give the practitioner new tools for a systems biology approach to experiment design.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent510150
dc.format.extent
dc.identifier.citationMélykúti, B, August, E, Papachristodoulou, A & El-Samad, H 2010, 'Discriminating between rival biochemical network models : Three approaches to optimal experiment design', BMC Systems Biology, vol. 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-4-38en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1752-0509-4-38
dc.identifier.issn1752-0509
dc.identifier.other250724365
dc.identifier.other0bb4498e-c6c5-4c30-8d54-5fedba9598ef
dc.identifier.other77950535005
dc.identifier.other20356406
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/8167
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBMC Systems Biology; 4()en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77950535005en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectStructural Biologyen
dc.subjectModeling and Simulationen
dc.subjectMolecular Biologyen
dc.subjectComputer Science Applicationsen
dc.subjectApplied Mathematicsen
dc.titleDiscriminating between rival biochemical network models : Three approaches to optimal experiment designen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/articleen

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
1752-0509-4-38.pdf
Stærð:
498.19 KB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format