Validity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritis

dc.contributor.authorHannink, Erin
dc.contributor.authorMansoubi, Maedeh
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Neil
dc.contributor.authorWilkins, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorNajafi, Ali A.
dc.contributor.authorWaller, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorDawes, Helen
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-30T09:55:01Z
dc.date.available2026-10-30T09:55:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-12
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. Healthcare Technology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Institution of Engineering and Technology.en
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to estimate the criterion validity of functional movement and posture measurement using remote technology systems in people with and without Axial spondylarthritis (axSpA). Methods: Validity and agreement of the remote-technology measurement of functional movement and posture were tested cross-sectionally and compared to a standard clinical measurement by a physiotherapist. The feasibility of remote implementation was tested in a home environment. There were two cohorts of participants: people with axSpA and people without longstanding back pain. In addition, a cost-consequence analysis was performed. Results: Sixty-two participants (31 with axSPA, 53% female, age = 45(SD14), BMI = 26.6(SD4.6) completed the study. In the axSpA group, cervical rotation, lumbar flexion, lumbar side flexion, shoulder flexion, hip abduction, tragus-to-wall and thoracic kyphosis showed a significant moderate to strong correlation; in the non-back pain group, the same measures showed significant correlation ranging from weak to strong. Conclusions: Although not valid for clinical use in its current form, the remote technologies demonstrated moderate to strong correlation and agreement in most functional and postural tests measured in people with AxSA. Testing the CV-aided system in a home environment suggests it is a safe and feasible method. Yet, validity testing in this environment still needs to be performed.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent9
dc.format.extent1242157
dc.format.extent110-118
dc.identifier.citationHannink, E, Mansoubi, M, Cronin, N, Wilkins, B, Najafi, A A, Waller, B & Dawes, H 2022, 'Validity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritis', Healthcare Technology Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 110-118. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl2.12038en
dc.identifier.doi10.1049/htl2.12038
dc.identifier.issn2053-3713
dc.identifier.other251494888
dc.identifier.other53c61d96-57a7-4c01-af0d-aeb632a73d95
dc.identifier.other85143392963
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/8983
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHealthcare Technology Letters; 9(6)en
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85143392963en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectcomputer visionen
dc.subjectcomputerised monitoringen
dc.subjecthealth careen
dc.subjectpatient monitoringen
dc.subjectpatient rehabilitationen
dc.subjectHealth Informaticsen
dc.subjectHealth Information Managementen
dc.titleValidity and feasibility of remote measurement systems for functional movement and posture assessments in people with axial spondylarthritisen
dc.type/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/articleen

Skrár

Original bundle

Niðurstöður 1 - 1 af 1
Nafn:
Healthcare_Tech_Letters_-_2022_-_Hannink_-_Validity_and_feasibility_of_remote_measurement_systems_for_functional_movement.pdf
Stærð:
1.18 MB
Snið:
Adobe Portable Document Format