Opin vísindi

Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors : clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response

Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors : clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response


Titill: Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors : clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response
Höfundur: Mathew, A. J.
Lund, M. L.
Pedersen, M. P.
Rasmussen, S. H.
Glintborg, B.
Loft, A. G.
Nissen, M. J.
Möller, B.
Rodrigues, A. M.
Santos, F. P.
... 10 fleiri höfundar Sýna alla höfunda
Útgáfa: 2024-05-21
Tungumál: Enska
Umfang: 11
Deild: Faculty of Medicine
Other departments
Birtist í: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology; ()
ISSN: 0300-9742
DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2024.2336743
Efnisorð: Gigtarlæknisfræði; Rheumatology; Immunology and Allergy; Immunology
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/4939

Skoða fulla færslu

Tilvitnun:

Mathew , A J , Lund , M L , Pedersen , M P , Rasmussen , S H , Glintborg , B , Loft , A G , Nissen , M J , Möller , B , Rodrigues , A M , Santos , F P , Rotar , Z , Tomšič , M , Relas , H , Peltomaa , R , Guðbjörnsson , B , Löve , Þ J , Kocaer , S B , Koken Avsar , A , Midtbøll Ørnbjerg , L & Østergaard , M 2024 , ' Enthesitis in a European registry-based cohort of patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors : clinical burden, patient-reported outcomes, and treatment response ' , Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology . https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2024.2336743

Útdráttur:

Objective: To explore the registration of enthesitis among biologic-naïve patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) initiating tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment across 12 European registries, compare the disease burden and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between patients with and without enthesitis, and assess the enthesitis treatment response. Method: Demographics, clinical characteristics, and PROs at first TNFi (TNFi-1) initiation (baseline) were assessed in patients with PsA, diagnosed by a rheumatologist, with versus without assessment of entheses and between those with versus without enthesitis. Enthesitis scores and resolution frequency were identified at follow-up. Results: Of 10 547 patients in the European Spondyloarthritis (EuroSpA) Research Collaboration Network initiating TNFi, 1357 underwent evaluation for enthesitis. Eight registries included a validated scoring system for enthesitis. At baseline, 874 patients underwent entheses assessment [Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) 485 patients, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) 389 patients]. Enthesitis was detected by MASES in 170/485 (35%, mean score ± sd 3.1 ± 2.4) and by SPARCC in 236/389 (61%, 4 ± 3.4). Achilles enthesitis was most frequent, by both MASES (unilateral/bilateral 28%/9%) and SPARCC (48%/18%). MASES/SPARCC baseline and follow-up scores for TNFi-1 were available for 100/105 patients. Of these, 63 patients (63%) (MASES) and 46 (43.8%) (SPARCC) achieved resolution of enthesitis. The site-specific enthesitis resolution was overall lower at SPARCC sites (peripheral; 63–80%) than at MASES sites (mainly axial; 82–100%) following TNFi-1. Disease activity and PROs were worse in patients with versus without enthesitis. Conclusion: Entheseal assessments are only registered in a minority of patients with PsA in routine care. When assessed, enthesitis was common, and a substantial proportion demonstrated resolution following treatment with TNFi-1.

Athugasemdir:

Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum: