Opin vísindi

Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor.author Ymamgulyyeva, Aysoltan
dc.contributor.author Kafescioğlu, Nilüfer
dc.contributor.author Harma, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-31T01:05:07Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-31T01:05:07Z
dc.date.issued 2023-04-08
dc.identifier.citation Ymamgulyyeva , A , Kafescioğlu , N & Harma , M 2023 , ' Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality ' , Family Relations . https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12881
dc.identifier.issn 0197-6664
dc.identifier.other 178881669
dc.identifier.other cf89b9da-b6cf-4228-80b5-752ae1b4da3b
dc.identifier.other ORCID: /0000-0002-3955-1526/work/132726426
dc.identifier.other unpaywall: 10.1111/fare.12881
dc.identifier.other 85152022761
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/4456
dc.description Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Family Relations published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Council on Family Relations.
dc.description.abstract Objective: This study aimed to investigate the actor–partner effects of attitudes toward group-based inequality as measured by social dominance orientation (SDO) and marital quality, and the indirect actor–partner effects of SDO on marital quality via ambivalent sexism and partners' perceptions of their own relationship power toward their partner. Background: Previous research suggests that certain social attitudes play a role in relationship processes. However, it is unclear whether broader views on social inequality could have an effect on partners' marital quality. Method: Ninety heterosexual married couples in Turkey (N = 180) responded via an online survey on SDO, marital quality, relationship power, and ambivalent sexism. Actor–partner interdependence model (APIM) and actor–partner interdependence model of mediation (APIMeM) were conducted to examine the direct and indirect actor–partner effects. Results: For indirect effects, men's SDO was negatively associated with their marital quality through their relationship power and hostile sexism. No significant indirect effects were found for women. However, women's relationship power was positively and their benevolent sexism was negatively associated with their own and their partners' marital quality. Conclusion: Our findings help develop a more comprehensive understanding of how the political, social, and personal aspects of our lives are connected with one another. Implications: Our study points to the importance of exploring the topic of men's and women's views toward social inequality and its effects on their close relationships in clinical practice and relational education.
dc.format.extent 18
dc.format.extent 778906
dc.format.extent
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Family Relations; ()
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject dyadic analysis
dc.subject marital quality
dc.subject relationship power
dc.subject sexism
dc.subject social dominance orientation
dc.subject Education
dc.subject Developmental and Educational Psychology
dc.subject Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
dc.title Examining actor–partner effects between social dominance, relationship power, sexism, and marital quality
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/fare.12881
dc.relation.url https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12881
dc.relation.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152022761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Psychology


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu