Title: | Correction: Groen et al. Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Life 2022, 12, 645. : Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer (Life, (2022), 12, 5, (645), 10.3390/life12050645) |
Author: |
... 2 more authors Show all authors |
Date: | 2023-03-02 |
Language: | English |
Scope: | 2383316 |
Department: | Faculty of Medicine |
Series: | Life; 13(3) |
ISSN: | 2075-1729 |
DOI: | 10.3390/life13030678 |
Subject: | Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics; General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology; Space and Planetary Science; Paleontology |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/4448 |
Citation:Groen , H C , den Hartog , A G , Heerink , W J , Kuhlmann , K F D , Kok , N F M , van Veen , R , Hiep , M A J , Snaebjornsson , P , Grotenhuis , B A , Beets , G L , Aalbers , A G J & Ruers , T J M 2023 , ' Correction: Groen et al. Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer. Life 2022, 12, 645. Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer (Life, (2022), 12, 5, (645), 10.3390/life12050645) ' , Life , vol. 13 , no. 3 , 678 . https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030678
|
|
Abstract:The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]. In the published version, the resection rate numbers as reported by Kok et al. [2] were cited incorrectly in the Introduction section on page 2. The sentence “Among patients operated on for LRRC, R0 resection rate using surgical navigation was 21% compared with 51% in a case control group” should be changed to “Among patients operated on for LRRC, R0 resection rate using surgical navigation was 79% compared with 49% in a case control group”. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
|
|
Description:Publisher Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
|