Opin vísindi

Return of genomic results does not motivate intent to participate in research for all : Perspectives across 22 countries

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor.author Milne, Richard
dc.contributor.author Morley, Katherine I
dc.contributor.author Almarri, Mohamed A
dc.contributor.author Atutornu, Jerome
dc.contributor.author Baranova, Elena E
dc.contributor.author Bevan, Paul
dc.contributor.author Cerezo, Maria
dc.contributor.author Cong, Yali
dc.contributor.author Costa, Alessia
dc.contributor.author Feijao, Carolina
dc.contributor.author de Freitas, Cláudia
dc.contributor.author Fernow, Josepine
dc.contributor.author Goodhand, Peter
dc.contributor.author Hasan, Qurratulain
dc.contributor.author Hibino, Aiko
dc.contributor.author Houeland, Gry
dc.contributor.author Howard, Heidi C
dc.contributor.author Hussain Sheikh, Zakir
dc.contributor.author Malmgren, Charlotta Ingvoldstad
dc.contributor.author Izhevskaya, Vera L
dc.contributor.author Jędrzejak, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.author Jinhong, Cao
dc.contributor.author Kimura, Megumi
dc.contributor.author Kleiderman, Erika
dc.contributor.author Liu, Keying
dc.contributor.author Mascalzoni, Deborah
dc.contributor.author Mendes, Álvaro
dc.contributor.author Minari, Jusaku
dc.contributor.author Nicol, Dianne
dc.contributor.author Niemiec, Emilia
dc.contributor.author Patch, Christine
dc.contributor.author Prainsack, Barbara
dc.contributor.author Rivière, Marie
dc.contributor.author Robarts, Lauren
dc.contributor.author Roberts, Jonathan
dc.contributor.author Romano, Virginia
dc.contributor.author Sheerah, Haytham A
dc.contributor.author Smith, James
dc.contributor.author Soulier, Alexandra
dc.contributor.author Steed, Claire
dc.contributor.author Stefánsdóttir, Vigdís Fjóla
dc.contributor.author Tandre, Cornelia
dc.contributor.author Thorogood, Adrian
dc.contributor.author Voigt, Torsten H
dc.contributor.author Wang, Nan
dc.contributor.author Yoshizawa, Go
dc.contributor.author Middleton, Anna
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-29T01:05:31Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-29T01:05:31Z
dc.date.issued 2022-05
dc.identifier.citation Milne , R , Morley , K I , Almarri , M A , Atutornu , J , Baranova , E E , Bevan , P , Cerezo , M , Cong , Y , Costa , A , Feijao , C , de Freitas , C , Fernow , J , Goodhand , P , Hasan , Q , Hibino , A , Houeland , G , Howard , H C , Hussain Sheikh , Z , Malmgren , C I , Izhevskaya , V L , Jędrzejak , A , Jinhong , C , Kimura , M , Kleiderman , E , Liu , K , Mascalzoni , D , Mendes , Á , Minari , J , Nicol , D , Niemiec , E , Patch , C , Prainsack , B , Rivière , M , Robarts , L , Roberts , J , Romano , V , Sheerah , H A , Smith , J , Soulier , A , Steed , C , Stefánsdóttir , V F , Tandre , C , Thorogood , A , Voigt , T H , Wang , N , Yoshizawa , G & Middleton , A 2022 , ' Return of genomic results does not motivate intent to participate in research for all : Perspectives across 22 countries ' , Genetics in Medicine , vol. 24 , no. 5 , pp. 1120-1129 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.002
dc.identifier.issn 1098-3600
dc.identifier.other 110106259
dc.identifier.other 11ed4f5c-f5c7-4289-a3f2-38f5fbde0d6b
dc.identifier.other 35125311
dc.identifier.other 85124015446
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/4108
dc.description Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine how attitudes toward the return of genomic research results vary internationally. METHODS: We analyzed the "Your DNA, Your Say" online survey of public perspectives on genomic data sharing including responses from 36,268 individuals across 22 low-, middle-, and high-income countries, and these were gathered in 15 languages. We analyzed how participants responded when asked whether return of results (RoR) would motivate their decision to donate DNA or health data. We examined variation across the study countries and compared the responses of participants from other countries with those from the United States, which has been the subject of the majority of research on return of genomic results to date. RESULTS: There was substantial variation in the extent to which respondents reported being influenced by RoR. However, only respondents from Russia were more influenced than those from the United States, and respondents from 20 countries had lower odds of being partially or wholly influenced than those from the United States. CONCLUSION: There is substantial international variation in the extent to which the RoR may motivate people's intent to donate DNA or health data. The United States may not be a clear indicator of global attitudes. Participants' preferences for return of genomic results globally should be considered.
dc.format.extent 10
dc.format.extent 1486038
dc.format.extent 1120-1129
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Genetics in Medicine; 24(5)
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Náttúrufræðingar
dc.subject Attitude
dc.subject DNA
dc.subject Genomics/methods
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Intention
dc.subject Surveys and Questionnaires
dc.subject United States
dc.title Return of genomic results does not motivate intent to participate in research for all : Perspectives across 22 countries
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.002
dc.contributor.department Other departments


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu