Opin vísindi

Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care

Skoða venjulega færslu

dc.contributor.author Zeuthen, Emilie
dc.contributor.author Wichmann, Sine
dc.contributor.author Schønemann-Lund, Martin
dc.contributor.author Järvisalo, Mikko J.
dc.contributor.author Rubenson-Wahlin, Rebecka
dc.contributor.author Sigurðsson, Martin Ingi
dc.contributor.author Holen, Erling
dc.contributor.author Bestle, Morten H.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-01-10T01:04:52Z
dc.date.available 2023-01-10T01:04:52Z
dc.date.issued 2022-11-25
dc.identifier.citation Zeuthen , E , Wichmann , S , Schønemann-Lund , M , Järvisalo , M J , Rubenson-Wahlin , R , Sigurðsson , M I , Holen , E & Bestle , M H 2022 , ' Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care ' , Frontiers in Medicine , vol. 9 , 1067162 , pp. 1067162 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1067162
dc.identifier.issn 2296-858X
dc.identifier.other 70208199
dc.identifier.other 0a18d68e-4a0d-467d-97e1-4890137f80b8
dc.identifier.other 85143811837
dc.identifier.other 36507497
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3828
dc.description Funding Information: Acknowledgment to the physicians who helped with pretesting and supervision in the development of the survey: Maj Kjaergaard Kamper, Margrethe Duch Christensen, Lars Hein, Ulrik Skram, Dorthea Christensen, and Christian Sahl. Acknowledgment to the physicians who helped distribute the survey in their departments: Jon Henrik Laake, Christoffer Grant Sølling, Peter Toft, Elsebeth Haunstrup, Karina Baekby Houborg, Anne Højager Nielsen, Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Hansjörg Selter, Helle Scharling Pedersen, Mette Krag Vogelius, Thomas Strøm, Bjørn Mygil, Mads Kristian Holten, Michelle Chew, Per Martin Bådstøløkken, Johan Olsson, Erik Bruno, Thomas Kander, Nicklas Jonsson, Johan Mårtensson, Mattias Ringh, Anders, Paulsson, Christian Kahlbom, Marcus Castegren, Michael Haney, Karl Silvhamn, Minna Tallgren, Erika Wilkman, Sari Karlsson, Timo Porkkala, Stepani Bendel, Juha Koskenkari, Sami Mäenpää, Ari Alaspää, Tadeusz Kaminski, Johanna Kaunisto, Sanna-Maria Pohjanpaju, Björn Jäschke, Jouko Kähkönen and Antti Mäkelä, Eirik Alnes Buanes, Christian Magnus Langberg, Per Erik Ernø, Kay Rudi Karlsen, and Anne Cecilie Tvedten. Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2022 Zeuthen, Wichmann, Schønemann-Lund, Järvisalo, Rubenson-Wahlin, Sigurðsson, Holen and Bestle.
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Fluid overload in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with higher mortality. There are few randomized controlled trials to guide physicians in treating patients with fluid overload in the ICU, and no guidelines exist. We aimed to elucidate how ICU physicians from Nordic countries define, assess, and treat fluid overload in the ICU. Materials and methods: We developed an online questionnaire with 18 questions. The questions were pre-tested and revised by specialists in intensive care medicine. Through a network of national coordinators. The survey was distributed to a wide range of Nordic ICU physicians. The distribution started on January 5th, 2022 and ended on May 6th, 2022. Results: We received a total of 1,066 responses from Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland. When assessing fluid status, respondents applied clinical parameters such as clinical examination findings, cumulative fluid balance, body weight, and urine output more frequently than cardiac/lung ultrasound, radiological appearances, and cardiac output monitoring. A large proportion of the respondents agreed that a 5% increase or more in body weight from baseline supported the diagnosis of fluid overload. The preferred de-resuscitation strategy was diuretics (91%), followed by minimization of maintenance (76%) and resuscitation fluids (71%). The majority declared that despite mild hypotension, mild hypernatremia, and ongoing vasopressor, they would not withhold treatment of fluid overload and would continue diuretics. The respondents were divided when it came to treating fluid overload with loop diuretics in patients receiving noradrenaline. Around 1% would not administer noradrenaline and diuretics simultaneously and 35% did not have a fixed upper limit for the dosage. The remaining respondents 63% reported different upper limits of noradrenaline infusion (0.05–0.50 mcg/kg/min) when administering loop diuretics. Conclusion: Self-reported practices among Nordic ICU physicians when assessing, diagnosing, and treating fluid overload reveals variability in the practice. A 5% increase in body weight was considered a minimum to support the diagnosis of fluid overload. Clinical examination findings were preferred for assessing, diagnosing and treating fluid overload, and diuretics were the preferred treatment modality.
dc.format.extent 11884945
dc.format.extent 1067162
dc.language.iso en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Frontiers in Medicine; 9()
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Svæfinga- og gjörgæslulæknisfræði
dc.subject de-resuscitation
dc.subject diuretics
dc.subject fluid accumulation
dc.subject fluid overload
dc.subject fluid removal
dc.subject ICU
dc.subject survey
dc.subject General Medicine
dc.title Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care
dc.type /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/researchoutputtypes/contributiontojournal/article
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fmed.2022.1067162
dc.relation.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143811837&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.contributor.department Perioperative Services
dc.contributor.department Faculty of Medicine


Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum:

Skoða venjulega færslu