Opin vísindi

Social justice, access and quality of healthcare in an age of austerity: : users’ perspective from rural Iceland

Social justice, access and quality of healthcare in an age of austerity: : users’ perspective from rural Iceland


Title: Social justice, access and quality of healthcare in an age of austerity: : users’ perspective from rural Iceland
Author: Gustafsdottir, Sonja S.
Fenger, Kristjana   orcid.org/0000-0003-2341-6781
Halldorsdottir, Sigridur   orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4428
Bjarnason, Thoroddur   orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-231X
Date: 2017-08-01
Language: English
Scope: 9
University/Institute: University of Akureyri
School: School of Health Sciences
School of Humanities
Series: International Journal of Circumpolar Health; 76(1)
ISSN: 1239-9736
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2017.1347476
Subject: Heilbrigðisþjónusta; Réttlæti; Dreifbýli; Jafnréttismál; Health care services; Social justice; Rural communities; Health care services; Social justice; Rural communities; Regional development; Road infrastructure; Tunnels; Iceland; SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being; SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/3734

Show full item record

Citation:

Gustafsdottir , S S , Fenger , K , Halldorsdottir , S & Bjarnason , T 2017 , ' Social justice, access and quality of healthcare in an age of austerity: users’ perspective from rural Iceland ' , International Journal of Circumpolar Health , vol. 76 , no. 1 , e1347476 . https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2017.1347476

Abstract:

Iceland is sparsely populated but social justice and equity has been emphasised within healthcare. The aim of the study is to examine healthcare services in Fjallabyggð, in rural northern Iceland, from users’ perspective and evaluate social justice, access and quality of healthcare in an age of austerity. Mixed-method approach with transformative design was used. First, data were collected with questionnaires (response rate of 53% [N=732] in 2009 and 30% [N=415] in 2012), and analysed statistically, followed by 10 interviews with healthcare users (2009 and 2014). The results were integrated and interpreted within Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Model. There was significantly less satisfaction with accessibility and variety of healthcare services in 2012 after services downsizing. Solid primary healthcare, good local elderly care, some freedom in healthcare choice and reliable emergency services were considered fundamental for life in a rural area. Equal access to healthcare is part of a fundamental human right. In times of economic downturn, people in rural areas, who are already vulnerable, may become even more vulnerable and disadvantaged, seriously threatening social justice and equity. With severe cutbacks in vitally important healthcare services people may eventually choose to self-migrate.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)