Opin vísindi

Challenges of using asthma admission rates as a measure of primary care quality in children : An international comparison

Challenges of using asthma admission rates as a measure of primary care quality in children : An international comparison


Titill: Challenges of using asthma admission rates as a measure of primary care quality in children : An international comparison
Höfundur: Lut, Irina
Lewis, Kate
Wijlaars, Linda
Gilbert, Ruth
Fitzpatrick, Tiffany
Lu, Hong
Guttmann, Astrid
Goldfield, Sharon
Lei, Shaoke
Gunnlaugsson, Geir   orcid.org/0000-0002-6674-2862
... 5 fleiri höfundar Sýna alla höfunda
Útgáfa: 2021-10
Tungumál: Enska
Umfang: 12
Svið: Social Sciences
Deild: Faculty of Sociology, Anthropology and Folkloristics
Birtist í: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy; 26(4)
ISSN: 1355-8196
DOI: 10.1177/13558196211012732
Efnisorð: Astmi; Barnalækningar; Heilbrigðisþjónusta; Asthma; paediatrics; primary care; Emergency Service, Hospital; Prevalence; Humans; Hospitalization; Child; Quality of Health Care; Asthma/diagnosis; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Health Policy
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/2697

Skoða fulla færslu

Tilvitnun:

Lut , I , Lewis , K , Wijlaars , L , Gilbert , R , Fitzpatrick , T , Lu , H , Guttmann , A , Goldfield , S , Lei , S , Gunnlaugsson , G , Hrafn Jónsson , S , Mechtler , R , Gissler , M , Hjern , A & Hardelid , P 2021 , ' Challenges of using asthma admission rates as a measure of primary care quality in children : An international comparison ' , Journal of Health Services Research and Policy , vol. 26 , no. 4 , pp. 251-262 . https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196211012732

Útdráttur:

Objectives: To demonstrate the challenges of interpreting cross-country comparisons of paediatric asthma hospital admission rates as an indicator of primary care quality. Methods: We used hospital administrative data from >10 million children aged 6–15 years, resident in Austria, England, Finland, Iceland, Ontario (Canada), Sweden or Victoria (Australia) between 2008 and 2015. Asthma hospital admission and emergency department (ED) attendance rates were compared between countries using Poisson regression models, adjusted for age and sex. Results: Hospital admission rates for asthma per 1000 child-years varied eight-fold across jurisdictions. Admission rates were 3.5 times higher when admissions with asthma recorded as any diagnosis were considered, compared with admissions with asthma as the primary diagnosis. Iceland had the lowest asthma admission rates; however, when ED attendance rates were considered, Sweden had the lowest rate of asthma hospital contacts. Conclusions: The large variations in childhood hospital admission rates for asthma based on the whole child population reflect differing definitions, admission thresholds and underlying disease prevalence rather than primary care quality. Asthma hospital admissions among children diagnosed with asthma is a more meaningful indicator for inter-country comparisons of primary care quality.

Athugasemdir:

Funding Information: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council studentships through the UCL-Birkbeck Doctoral Training Programme (grant number MR/N013867/1); Health Data Research UK; and the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The Ontario analyses of this study were supported by ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) as well as funding from a Canadian Institute for Health Research Applied Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research (grant number APR 126 377). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred. AH, GG and SHJ were funded by a grant from EU Horizon 2020 (grant number 634201). Funding Information: The Ontario datasets used in this study were linked, using unique encoded identifiers, and analyzed at ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, the Ontario MOHLTC or CIHI is intended or should be inferred. This research benefits from and contributes to the NIHR Children and Families Policy Research Unit, but was not commissioned by the NIHR Policy Research Programme. This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the English NHS as part of their care and support. This work uses data from Iceland provided by patients and collected by the Directorate of Health for monitoring and quality assurance of care. Funding Information: The Ontario datasets used in this study were linked, using unique encoded identifiers, and analyzed at ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). The opinions, results and conclusions reported in this paper are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES, the Ontario MOHLTC or CIHI is intended or should be inferred. This research benefits from and contributes to the NIHR Children and Families Policy Research Unit, but was not commissioned by the NIHR Policy Research Programme. This work uses data provided by patients and collected by the English NHS as part of their care and support. This work uses data from Iceland provided by patients and collected by the Directorate of Health for monitoring and quality assurance of care. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by the Medical Research Council studentships through the UCL-Birkbeck Doctoral Training Programme (grant number MR/N013867/1); Health Data Research UK; and the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The Ontario analyses of this study were supported by ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) as well as funding from a Canadian Institute for Health Research Applied Chair in Reproductive and Child Health Services and Policy Research (grant number APR 126 377). Parts of this material are based on data and information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information. The analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred. AH, GG and SHJ were funded by a grant from EU Horizon 2020 (grant number 634201). Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.

Skrár

Þetta verk birtist í eftirfarandi safni/söfnum: