Title: | Pitfalls in scalp high-frequency oscillation detection from long-term EEG monitoring |
Author: |
|
Date: | 2020-06-02 |
Language: | English |
Scope: | 432 |
University/Institute: | Háskólinn á Akureyri University of Akureyri |
School: | Hug- og félagsvísindasvið (HA) School of Humanities and Social Sciences (UA) |
Department: | Sálfræðideild (HA) Faculty of Psychology (UA) |
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology;11 |
ISSN: | 1664-2295 |
DOI: | 10.3389/fneur.2020.00432 |
Subject: | Neurology; Brain; Epilepsy; Taugasjúkdómar; Heilinn; Flogaveiki |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11815/1950 |
Citation:Gerner, N., Thomschewski, A., Marcu, A., Trinka, E. og Höller, Y. (2020). Pitfalls in scalp high-frequency oscillation detection from long-term EEG monitoring. Frontiers in Neurology, 11, 432. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00432
|
|
Abstract:Aims: Intracranially recorded high-frequency oscillations (>80 Hz) are considered a
candidate epilepsy biomarker. Recent studies claimed their detectability on the scalp
surface. We aimed to investigate the applicability of high-frequency oscillation analysis
to routine surface EEG obtained at an epilepsy monitoring unit.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed surface EEGs of 18 patients with focal epilepsy
and six controls, recorded during sleep under maximal medication withdrawal. As a
proof of principle, the occurrence of motor task-related events during wakefulness
was analyzed in a subsample of six patients with seizure- or syncope-related
motor symptoms. Ripples (80–250 Hz) and fast ripples (>250 Hz) were identified by
semi-automatic detection. Using semi-parametric statistics, differences in spontaneous
and task-related occurrence rates were examined within subjects and between
diagnostic groups considering the factors diagnosis, brain region, ripple type, and
task condition.
Results: We detected high-frequency oscillations in 17 out of 18 patients and in
four out of six controls. Results did not show statistically significant differences in the
mean rates of event occurrences, neither regarding the laterality of the epileptic focus,
nor with respect to active and inactive task conditions, or the moving hand laterality.
Significant differences in general spontaneous incidence [WTS(1) = 9.594; p = 0.005]
that indicated higher rates of fast ripples compared to ripples, notably in patients with
epilepsy compared to the control group, may be explained by variations in data quality.
Conclusion: The current analysis methods are prone to biases. A common agreement
on a standard operating procedure is needed to ensure reliable and economic detection
of high-frequency oscillations.
|
|
Rights:Copyright © 2020 Gerner, Thomschewski, Marcu, Trinka and Höller. This is an
open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted,
provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the
original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic
practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply
with these terms.
|